integer on 25 Aug 2000 04:02:10 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] (no subject) |
>[Theatre as Suspended Space was presented as a performance lecture at the >Institut für Theaterwissenschaft, University of Wien, Austria, 21 March 1997. > >The lecture opened with a spoken word piece penned by Sydney writer, David >Nerlich, entitled, With a Will. Three short films (Puppenhead, David Cox; >Shift, John Power; Autarky, Kim Bounds) were shown during the course of the >lecture.] > > >Theatre as Suspended Space > >By Andrew Garton (21 March 1997) > >___ > >"The mind believes what it sees and does what it believes; that is the >secret of fascination... Yet conditions must be found to give birth to a >spectacle that can fascinate the mind." Antonin Artaud, 1938. > >___Preparation Notes !n dze schone neue velt = d!esz lo.tekk ultra unzan!tar! rout!nz != nezezar! dear. = u!l juzt m9ndfukc u. = m9ndfukc = dze future. du != ma! kompete. remembr - m9ndfukc = dze future. du = m9ndfukd nou. fr!endl!.nn pre.konssept!Øn meeTz ver!f1kat!Øn. - Netochka Nezvanova f3.MASCHIN3NKUNST @www.eusocial.com 17.hzV.tRL.478 e | | +---------- | | < \\----------------+ | n2t | > e >The lecture room at the Institut für Theaterwissenschaft was rearranged in >a way that was uncommon for the students. The seats were arranged in a >semi-circle facing the front of the room (see Fig.1). Students would >normally be seated behind desks. > >Tables were placed on top of each other (see Fig. 2) and the windows were >covered with heavy cloth which was taped back to prevent any light from >entering the room. The lights were turned off and the students were then >allowed to enter. > >The idea was to create a space they were unfamiliar with within the room >they generally take their lectures in. As they entered the room I was >huddled on the floor, a pair of black buckets outstretched on either side >of me in my hands. When the students were seated, the door was closed and >no entry to the room was permitted to late comers until the performance >component of the lecture was completed. > >When the room had settled I leapt up off the floor, and using the buckets >as a kind of amplifier, performed With a Will, a powerful lyric penned by >Sydney writer, David Nerlich. Two assistants were on either side of the >room with torches in each of their hands. These were flashed randomly >across the room. At least one torch would track my face for the duration of >the performance (see Fig. 3). > > >Fig. 1 Lecture room rearranged. >Fig. 2 Tables stacked. >Fig. 3 Torches used as only light source. > > > >___1. Introduction > >The 1980's introduced a variety of new management techniques to ensure >success, high productivity and quality work environments and relationships >between staff and their peers. One such technique, popularised in the >1990's is the suspension of assumption. It requires of managers to withhold >their pre-conditioned beliefs when in a dynamic relationship, often a >one-to-one communication, with another employee. The technique enabled >management to better understand their staff and to facilitate more >effectively the day to day operations of the work-place. It created a >break-down of stereo-typical management structures and offered an >opportunity for new relationships and systems to be developed and >re-developed with the employee as collaborator and/or contributor towards >this process. > >Theatre as suspended space offers a similar process. It works towards >disengaging both audience and performer from traditional forms of theatre >and its production, towards a spatial poetry,1an exploration of >environment, gesture, communication and global universality in a world >quickly closing in on itself. Moreover, it is about reclamation of public >space, both traditional and emergent environments. Perhaps a rekindling of >what the author Russell Hoban describes in his novel, Ridley Walker, as >"first knowledge." > >Given that we have access to theatres and the means with which to produce >live works in countless ways, why a suspended space, why reclaim what [we >perceive] already exists? > >That which exists, is not for the changing. It is for the maintenance of a >social order steeped in the absolute denial and prohibition of free >expression - that which liberates the imagination and a discovery of its >inert spiritual and creative capabilities. > > >___2. Theatre Commodified > >The history of modern society is not short of examples of the co-option by >the social elite of performance, ritual, theatre and music and the >prohibition of these activities in public spaces. They did so in order to >sustain a social order enabling them to gain the economic advantage and >ensure the populace was cultivated for the machinations of this order.2 As >early as the Roman Empire the castration of public spectacle via theatre >was evident. The High Pontiff, Scipio Nasica, had all the theatres in Rome >reduced to rubble. St Augustine, in The City of the Gods, suggested that >theatre induced mysterious changes not only in the minds of individuals but >in the entire nation.3 The Pontiff, wrote St Augustine, "...prohibited the >theatre to prevent a moral pestilence." > >During the Middle Ages the jongleur, both musician (vocalist, >instrumentalist) and entertainer (story-teller, acrobat, mime, etc.) would >travel from village to village and perform privately and publicly. The >jongleurs' income was derived from these performances and their material >was gathered, assimilated and modified from what they heard, what they saw >along the way. They ensured that access to music and theatre remained the >privilege of every social class. They were essential to the social >circulation of information. The jongleur "...was music and the spectacle of >the body. He alone created it, carried it with him, and completely >organised its circulation within society."4 > >With few exceptions, theatre and music was inseparable from daily life. The >streets of the feudal world were alive with song, dance, mime... an active >theatre that engaged the community. It need not be watched. It was to be >lived. > >Up to the fourteenth century, the jongleur's lifestyle became increasingly >unacceptable; the Church "...accusing [them] of paganism and magical >practises."5 Satirical songs about current events were banned and jongleurs >threatened with imprisonment. As early as 1209, the Church announced >"...that at saints' vigils, there shall not, in the churches, be any >theatre dances, indecent entertainment, gatherings of singers, or worldly >songs, such as to incite the souls of the listeners to sin..."6 In 1212, it >required of priests to "...prohibit, under penalty of excommunication, >assemblies for dancing and singing from entering churches or cemeteries."7 > >Eventually, the Church secularised music, and the courts of the nobles of >the time distanced music and theatre from the people, buying and/or hiring >jongleurs, monopolising artistic creativity in its many forms. The >jongleurs "...became professionals bound to a single master, domestics, >producers of spectacles exclusively reserved for a minority."8 Theatre >became a commodity. Along with the other arts, it became an essential tool >for the spread of capitalism and the maintenance of power and social order. >The theatre space became the physical manifestation of this separation, >creating an audience and excluding them from the process of theatre, >transforming what had been the socialisation of information into a medium >that would make people essential to the machinations of exchange, essential >to the spread of capital. The medium is the message, but both the medium >and the message is a lie. > >___3. Make then Forget, make them Believe, and Silence them > >Jacques Attali, in Noise, talks of three strategic uses of music by power. >"...It seems that music is used and produced in the ritual in an attempt to >make people forget the general violence; in another, it is employed to make >people believe in the harmony of the world, that there is order in exchange >and legitimacy in commercial power; and finally, there is one in which it >serves to silence, by mass-producing a deafening, syncretic kind of music, >and censoring all other human voices." > >He goes on to further stress the machinations of three essential zones >towards a social order, "Make people Forget, make them Believe, Silence >them. In all three cases music is a tool of power: of ritual power when it >is a question of making people forget the fear of violence; of >representative power when it is a question of making them believe in order >and harmony; and of bureaucratic power when it is a question of silencing >those who oppose it... When power wants to make people forget, music is >ritual sacrifice, the scapegoat; when it wants them to believe, music is >enactment, representation; when it wants to silence them, it is reproduced, >normalised, repetition." > >Theatre provides power with exactly the same formula for the maintenance of >social order. Music is theatre, theatre is music. The two are synonymous >and perform the same role, within mainstream society. "The mind believes >what it sees and does what it believes..." The messengers of capital are >thorough. Throughout the world it has created, and continues to create, an >audience for its own message. The young that grow up in this environment >are quickly consumed and co-opted into the service of capital. They cannot >rebel against it, against something they have been taught so thoroughly to >believe they want, need, cannot do without. All that glitters is not gold. >There is no better example of this than in the phenomenon of Heldenplatz. _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold