Sky_Mykyta on 30 Oct 2000 04:56:40 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Nader and US election processes |
I'm not American but I've been watching the Nader v the rest debate with interest because here in Australia there is very little difference between the major right and left parties (no offence to anyone who disagrees). Nader seems to offer a real alternative and something to end the stalemate of voting for the lesser of two evils. What really amazes me about the whole thing though, is the vehement disagreement among the left over whether it is worthwhile to vote Nader or whether that will just ensure a conservative victory. I don't profess to understand the US voting system, but don't you have preferences? Isn't it possible to vote 1 Nader, 2 Gore, so that in the instance that Nader isn't successful his preferences will still flow to Gore rather than Bush? I'd really love someone to explain the system to me, because the debate so far seems excessively divisive. Thanks, Sky This email and any attachments are confidential, and may be subject to legal privilege. If you received this email in error, please let us know immediately by return email. _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold