poetry on Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:25:35 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Heideggerian |
Ontological Impossibility When does the concept make contact with the condition of objects. The condition, not the object or set. Volume and weight, mass and density emerge from the object. Colors saturate the emoting eye. The aspect of time in a thing and groups of things. Time is the energy waiting there, and time is the energy brought to the waiting to be viewed. Mass is the moments of time in an object, which time is conditioned by the object's viewing. The moments of time in time contained by an object do not exist outside the object's being viewed. A conceptual frame constructs itself around the temporal condition of viewing, and the work develops in this active space, surrounding the representation, the object condition or thingness being viewed. There is energy in objects, and there is the energy brought to objects by the viewer, and the sign exists, if it can ever be said to exist outside this constructiveness, as a complex of emotive and analytical rhythms. The impression that objects were complete by themselves had to be overcome, just as the impression had to be overcome that the emotion attached to the object was (if there ever was an object) what was the matter, being all that mattered, since being is matter and the energy that inheres in it, the subject (if there ever was a subject). But can there be a concept without an object? The condition of art as slavery, a slave to appearances, and here is its point of contact with mass consciousness, even for an art that will never be understood by the masses. Historical trauma recorded in the repetition of forms. "The Last German in Italy" does not only inflect Milton, but demonstrates that a primary dissonance in social time, war and revolution, across several centuries, has not been exhausted. Art and its mastery (repetition) of forms labors over time within time, transferring what cannot be stated by the concept of transference. A poem gets made, only its making involves hundreds of years, sprung--not spun--from fragments in time. The destructiveness that inheres in the fragment, where remnants are pieces left over capable of being gathered again, remade. A poem gets made, but the subject-object relation existing in material social reality remains in place, unaffected. Afflicted, letters endure a word, inured to the confrontation their combination makes graphic. Space materializes through the forms made for it. Empty space is everywhere, anywhere form is absent, though this condition does not have to be identical to formlessness. In music, it is what is known as silence. Chromatic tracings. There is no more sensuous experience than the coinciding of two ideas. The demand that every hour be lived in dedication to the art that a life has been charged with conditions visual and auditory flows and the susceptibility that must not take a subjugated form or attitude, position, towards the object (poetry). The photo-poems as products of a subjugated consciousness, deforming the originals in a relation of mutually accusatory signing. The problem of poetry in history. "The poet, whom one can never see . . . bound by forms . . . lives, which we call inventions, take[s] wing." Schematic pasts ignore unpredictability in the separate, disruptive forces that shape an event. Driven by the moment to the moment of disappearing, the motive forces do not even inhere in the outline of an event. Interpretation imposes an outline (probability) on an effect that can never be reduced by causality to the condition of evidence. Every determination exterminates the possibility of something else, something unexpected, something new. Definition of either a concept or a face destines the image to a resolution, which is not a focus. A camera's insufficiency, honed to a sharpness calibrated on the basis of an eye that cannot see. The position of the subject: you cannot see me. The apparatus interferes, unable to intervene. What does a poem want to bring about? A poetry may be about being in the condition of being-in-language, where it (what is) (what it is) cannot be found in the language in which the poetry might be said to exist. A poetry could be about the condition of being written in one language, waiting for another. "During a long process the face and figure of the individual changes in condition and expression, [if] the face is in the course of constant processing, and its processing and change in appearance depend on the strength and tension in the culture contained in a system of design, thoughtfulness, with which the organism is occupied." The conception is neither the face nor the form of the poem, though the degree of shaping force can be read--and it is this energy that poets read, how they read, that poets read one another for the degree of force and how the shaping energy swerves, veers, jaggedness, impatience, speed, sonority, miscellaneity. None of this can happen except in countenancing traditional forms, facing the past more than studying it, confronting it, staring it down, or away. A poetry summons the masters, it is not summoned by them. The summons, or judgment, of a new work in relation to the value assigned to the older works in its language, reading a poetry by the light of earlier poetries, subordinates the conditions under which the new work is conceived to an external process, surface features, false echoes in the hall of mirrors. Scholarship is almost always skin deep. The poet who needs to make something from something someone else once made reads a poetry from inside its skin. How can it know itself in any other way? Who would want to know themselves or be known among others to others externally? That this happens at all in reading poetry is the closest a poem comes to resembling a painting on a wall. That a poem does something more, and here may be where it evades value, the value assigned to art objects--in the way that the visual arts undergo value conversions, given their object identities--can be found in the proposition that no poem contains itself. It may even be that poetry evades value and a stable place in a language and culture, which is always a formation involving market forces, and institutional instruction. Visual and auditory, concrete and conceptual, the intangibility of poetry--its elusiveness--protects it from instrumental applications, even when the poetry yields momentarily to a political use, or ideology. Momentarily, never monumentally. A poetry compelled to monumentalize itself becomes an architecture, and abandons conception. The loose ends that a work leaves unthought provide the areas for other poets to work, providing variations. How to read for what has been left undone, what poets also read for, at least those who refuse to approach a poem with their eyes. "A camera can do that." The conception was never intended to become a monument. The composition runs out of questions. The conception questions itself to the verge of not existing, unable to believe in itself, barely being able to be. Viability, or validity. Visibility. Wish things to be that way and they will and will not. Art is made in the space that separates living from life, when living is linked with life. No one has ever died in a work of art. Can writing a poem be a matter of life or death? How far will a poetry drive itself to prove the necessity of its coming into language? The unbearable urgency can only be recognized after the emergency has passed, and the life has passed into the work. Articulateness is terrifying, since composure preconceives, designs, and constructs a posture prior to the event and encounter. Every face is false, unless it contradicts itself. What do you see when you say you see me? Every conversation constructs a new face for the face that is viewed. Aggression occurs in the face that confronts another with the weight and volume of a voice that believes it belongs to it. Where is the face that pulls away in disbelief at the voice that appears to belong to it? Life is torn from time, and knows itself as volume and color. Is this why the face pulls away from its voice, under the weight of the thought about being said (constructed)--isn't this also conception? How can what gets said be known outside its saying, either before or after the event in an exchange of words? What gets said gets used to its saying and goes its own way, going away, diffused. The shape in the space between note and interval. A text exerts no influence as long as its labor remains locked in itself. In the interlocking with another is where we hear ourselves. The major and minor tonalities, the division of the major and minor chord, the vertical and horizontal planes of chordal hearing (melody). Discipline (study) cannot produce the necessary, urgent, life-threatening note. This is the agony of scholarship, and key to interpretive aggressions (ideology). Discourse grabs without grasping. Lost, they appear before one another, among others, for a moment that can barely be signified by a smile. Who are they? It is not enough to say they are caught in a definition (others' eyes). Age does not signify, for art does not know the artificiality of counting life, counting on life. Art counts on life to show it where to go--it never knows where it is--what, why, where are you going, where you are going I want to go. The constraint of something more difficult, more real and more absolute ("chamber music, that music which is descended from higher things") and the constraint throws light. Chamber music, and fescue of the sonata. There is no action other than that passing into the conception of what we are as far as we are art, and that is all we are, sound-structures, emerging and receding, and in deciding how they should enter, meet and greet one another, how they were to proceed with one another as though they were real people meeting, instigating an event in the radius of the point of convergence. "Pianoforte." "Bach's wide gaps between parts play an important role in preventing a vertical blending, i.e. the being changed and changing of whole columns of notes or hosts of chords, no matter whether rhythmically diminished or caught up by the releases from the dominant." The messengers arrive from the other side, the deafening silence of a car bomb detonated in the space that separates one note from another. Birth does not confer the right to live. We are who we are in the logic of where we are, for as long as where we are has the power to dictate who we are (it says what we are) when we are neither here nor should be, since what we could be and are not is not here, not even near where "here" is, how it appears, the wall or screen across which pass shapes that have mass, volume, density, color and contrast, light and shadow, voiced and unvoiced, vocal and visual phenomena. The messengers have begun to arrive. He is here where he should not be, if there is still some place where he could be, or once was. She isn't either, anywhere. That is all that remains of us, and it can never be taken away. They have never been able to be the time and place where they are. The "e" inserted between two identical consonants, before or after an "i" or "a". The conjugation does not soften the thought. The experience of the words for the thought itself, outside itself (not beside itself). Beside itself, a blind confidence in unprecedented volume gave rise to an illusion. The event does not wait to happen. The unheard-of event that is not anticipated can never be understood. A parting gesture purer for the not knowing itself as a sign for departure: a hand in a vertical movement inches from her face. "The condition of exile." How a face dissolves in a foreign language. That she lived in a world where it was apparently still possible to smile, and to incarnate estrangement not as an aesthetic principle but as a life condition, a deformity imposed--almost, at times, a death-in-life. _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold