McKenzie Wark on Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:51:53 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] P is for Property |
VECTORAL TIMES 17TH AUGUST 2001 P is for Property... McKenzie Wark Two stories on the front page of today's New York Times point plain and simple to where the real action is in the 'new new economy'. as in the old economy -- its about property. After President Bush announced his bzyantine rules for government funding of stem cell research, it turns out that one single foundation may own the patent to that precious cell. Stem cell research is a promising field for possible cures for a wide range of illnesses, from diabetes to Parkinson's disease. Stem cells extracted from human embryos could be cultured to produce insulin or new nerve cells. According to US Patent 6,200,806 the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) owns both the method of isolating the cells and the cells themselves. The foundation has already granted rights to a biotech company called Geron Corporation, which provided funding for the research. The patent is open to legal challenge, but if it holds up, researchers using stem cell lines that match the patent must do so under terms set by the patent's owners. Researchers may purchase the stem cell line from an outfit set up by WARF, but must agree to restrictions that pander to Geron's interests. No one is sure yet whether stem cell research will provide the cures touted, but already the research agenda is being twisted towards the commodification of any possible benefits. The 'new, new economy' is not about information or the internet or connectivity or content or any of the other standard industry blather, it is about property, as it always is in a class society. The story about the stem cell cash-in ran right next to one announcing that five major movie studios have agreed to a joint venture to profit from the downloading of movies from the internet. Fearful of a repeat of the Napster situation, where millions of music lovers freely exchanged music files as a gift to each other, the studios are moving to rope off the movie download future as a pure for-profit operation. The scheme has been much delayed, as one would expect, by the pissing contest between studio honchos of MGM, Paramount, Sony, Warners and Universal. Disney and 20th Century Fox say they plan their own proprietary systems, just to mess things up further. While not agreed on the price, the deal from all these schemes will likely be much the same. You can download a movie, but you can only keep it on your hard drive for 30 days. The copy of 'Mission Impossible 13' you paid for will self destruct within 24 hours of its first viewing. You will also have to wait weeks, maybe months after the film's theatrical release for the pleasure. So what does this have to do with stem cells? Stem cells that may save lives and action films about taking them are both forms of 'intellectual property', and the privatisation of property is the engine of commodified development. If you will pardon a giant leap from the particular to the general, I would argue that these stories are straws in the wind of a new development in class society -- the rise of what I would call a vectoralist class. What distinguishes the vectoralist class is its seizure of information as a form of property. Amid all of the noise and blather of internet 'tulipmania', a much more significant development was gathering pace. The cornering of the market for knowledge and culture as intellectual property. The means by which it is stored or distributed are largely irrelevant. The movie studios really don't care if you buy a DVD or download, so long as they preserve their margin. What matters to the vectoralist class is cutting off access to any vector along which information might be stored or transmitted that might dare to assert its autonomy from the 'business model'. As stem cell scientists have already discovered, intellectual property can be a huge barrier to the free creation that is at the heart of science (or for that matter, art and culture.) Just as the capitalist class privatised the agricultural commons three centuries ago, the vectorialist class is privatising the information commons. The privatisation of information puts the question of class back on the map, but through the development of new class antagonisms. The old economy of capital and labour, landlords and farmers did not evaporate in a puff of information age smoke, but it may well be the case that new class forces have superimposed themselves on the old class order, with different agendas and different interests. For a more comprehensive exposition of this new theory of class, check out A Hacker Manifesto, at the url below. Or just keep reading the news feeds, and checking for clues. A HACKER MANIFESTO 2.0 http://www.feelergauge.net/projects/hackermanifesto/version_2.0/ NOTES Sheryl Gay Stolberg, 'Patent on Human Stem Cell Puts US Officials in Bind'; and Rick Lyman, 'Hollywood, an Eye on Piracy, Plans Movies for a Fee', New York Times, !7th August, 2001 http://www.nytimes.com McKenzie Wark, Brooklyn, NY, mw35@nyu.edu _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold