eduardo on Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:10:26 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> GIVING IS RECEIVING |
__________________________________ Barbrook wrote: Despite its many benefits in the wider economy, the greatest impact of the hi-tech gift economy will still be cultural. The information society is built upon information. The Net already provides the structure for realising an unfulfilled revolutionary demand: media freedom for all. Authors can publish their writings on their own websites. Musicians can release their tunes on MP3 first. Film-makers can distribute digital files of their movies. Not just the right to consume media, but also the right to produce media too. Even better, the Net is inspiring novel forms of expression. Things beyond the delights of making and distributing old media in improved ways, Net.Art. Blogging. Webcams. These are the first experiments in a new aesthetics - an aesthetics which reflect the social mores and technical protocols of the Net. Interactive. Modifiable. Accessible. Communal. Democratic. Upgradable. We can only imagine what our imaginations will be able to create once the Net begins to reach its full potential. We can only dream what happens when the hi-tech gift economy makes possible the flourishing of a socially advanced gift culture: ___________________________________ My response: The gift phenomenon is based on reciprocity. In the end, it does not matter if money or gifts are being exchanged. The fact is that something is being exchanged for some sort of gain or benefit -- often legitimation, which can be considered one of the major benefits of the net, equates capital. Simply because capital gain may become decentralized does not mean that power will be shifted in some significant way. Major corporations, when between a rock and a hard place, will certainly follow IBM's steps upon releasing its first PC in 1981: let open source be part of their strategy to survive. Hence, we got a lot of PC clones. Copyright may become demoted or drastically modified, but corporations will make sure to be on the top of the profit chain in some form. As much as I enjoyed the essay, I must admit that nettimers need to get real, playing hardball in the end needs major funding, even when it comes as a gift for progress. Peace, Eduardo Navas # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net