Nemonemini on Mon, 2 Dec 2002 11:55:58 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Empire, Negri and Hardt |
I went to Amazon to review Singer's One World and ended up reviewing Empire. Empire by Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri Halflife of a republic...? John Landon This riddling work has been the target of so many direct hits and the howls-of-protests of liberal political-sci mandarins that the only thing left (in a postmodern vein, 'these fragments have we from our ruins')is to review is the footnote on page 31, "...the thesis that the decline of Rome began with Caesar was continually reproposed throughout the historiography of the age of the Enlightenment..." That about says it. These critics must ask who gets the last laugh. The books sifts the leftist omens of capital demise with the correct foreboding, but not prophecy: It is easy to protest postmodern pastiche, but history shows every chance republics decay into empires, and their decadence begins not with the barbarians invading but with the appearance of Ceasars. Have the Caesars appeared? They may have upgraded their act, and after so much expertise with Madison-Ad you'll never know what hit you.The question seems taken for granted in the book, but its crypto-Spenglerianism with a Foucauldian postmodern face seems unsure, or else ambivalent, or else licking it chops, if by a change of labels this decadence might do the job of failed revolution. What an odd book. I read it twice, but was unable to get with the program, but then saw their point, better the leftist Caesars??? 'We will make you a better offer'. In fact, the riddle of the book is solved by taking it in fragments, a puzzle to be solved, with many pieces disassembled, from Descartes to Derrida. Leftist thought is fatigued, this like the sufi stop shatters dead brain mass. Anything but more Second Internationale cliches. However, there is no postmodern escape. The postmodern provokes the an awesome task the Russian revolution too obviously failed to resolve, actually understanding the modern so you can surpass it! That's the catch in this type of argument. You are back to the grind with schoolboy lessons ('discipline and punish') in the 'regles du jeu', with or without a Voltaire wig. The postmodern simply jacknifes against its modernism, and becomes its next outcome. Fascinating, unnerving book. But the solution to the revolutionary problem requires a republic... John Landon Website on the eonic effect http://eonix.8m.com nemonemini@eonix.8m.com # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net