Dan Wang on Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:18:26 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> People offline |
And what do you mean by "offline"? As in, totally without internet presence? No e-mail? Or just without a website? What about a group that exists but hasn't updated or in any meaningful way used their site for more than five years? For several years I was on the LETPRESS list (for letterpress printers) and pretty regularly someone would post a for-sale list belonging to a printer friend of theirs who was without access. Sometimes these would be old school printers who have an aversion to e-media. So the LETPRESS list exists only in cyberspace, but includes a small but notable offline element...or would this be a case of an online regime absorbing offline elements within reach, and thereby further marginalizing those folks who are completely without even indirect e-connections? Reading your call for suggestions, the first crew I thought of was the old Fifth Estate collective out of Detroit. I knew that they were as a newspaper totally offline for the longest time (even though some individual members have a web presence). But then I double checked, and wow, even they have a rudimentary site up. My guess it's the doings of the new Tennessee editorial group, who are mostly gen xrs. dsw > In 2004 I am going to be collecting stories and writing about people > and groups that are not online. Some can't afford it; many aren't sure > what benefits it brings, and some don't have connectivity. Others have > tried it and dropped off. A few are just opposed to it for various > reasons. <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net