Ryan Griffis on Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:38:09 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> RE: Limits of Networking |
Hi, > but to push technology into a hypertrophic state, further than it is meant to go. We must scale up, not unplug. Then, during the passage of technology into this injured, engorged, and unguarded condition, it will be sculpted anew into something better, something in closer agreement with the real wants and desires of its users.< while i don't have a problem with the critique of 'protocol' as such (which is actually quite useful for me), i have some questions about the seeming opposition implied here - to either 'scale up' or unplug.' followed with the notion of 'sculpting' the network (both biological and IT) into something better, in the likeness of 'the real wants and desires of its users' i want to ask: who's desires are currently being represented, and how are they so if they run against the desires of users (who are?)? it seems there's an assumption of the natural progression of technology that can't be resisted any other way than generating chaos from which to reign it in after those in power lose control. this seems highly suspect to me for many reasons. i understand the context in which this discussion is happening, but i don't see why all 'slow' forms of resistence are seen as superstitious and/or based on negative definitions (anti-tech). much reverse engineering seems to me an activity neither aimed at acceleration nor stagnation (but why would that be assumed negative?). i don't know that an accelerated (counter)aesthetic domination of biotech or IT guarantees anything liberatory. who is it exactly that we think will benefit from such a process? and how can such a process occur without the simultaneous expansion of regulatory protocol? of course, i could be reading all of this wrong... but hopefully these questions are not completely out of the ballpark. best, ryan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net