Rob van Kranenburg on Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:07:37 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Who shares this sense of both urgency and agency? |
[speaking of urgency. this message has been delayed several times by ulusive bugs that cropped up in nettime's server migration -- apologies, the mod squad] Meeting Sampo Lume Centre, Helsinki, August 20, 2004 I. Urgency because the inevitability of ubicomp connectivity can be clearly=20 argued from both the dominance of distributed and pervasive computing as=20 code and interface driving models and the real promise this time (at least= =20 believed by business) of enhancing productivity through IT with 'turning=20 your supply chain into a value centre' and anti theft and job reducing=20 retail reasonings that fuel RFID. Our basic problem with pervasive computing/ubicomp/Things That Think/=20 Disapearring Computer/Ambient Intelligence/ is that it sets forward as its= =20 very reason for existence its disappearance as some thing perceivable as=20 techn=E9. We know that technology always disappears into the fabrics of=20 everyday life, as Weiser states, but this is the first time that a=20 technology is delibaretely claiming this as its reason for being=20 technology. If we take the case of electricity we see a very diverse field of=20 projects, ideas, probes and experiments to have disappeared into our walls= =20 and floors only to hand us the most blackboxed of interfaces: an on/off=20 switch. Ubicomp will fuel a drive towards blackboxed interfaces that seemingly=20 allow for a hightened interactivity but axiomatically hide all procedural= =20 knowledge, protocol, and code. At the very moment when the internet is empowering lowlevel users, an=20 internet of things is being rolled out -spearheaded by RFID - that will=20 empower only those who know at which intersections the readers should be=20 put so as to gather maximum data. II The sense of agency that we experience stems from our perception of this=20 coming internet of things, this connectivity, as perhaps not a hybrid=20 space, but a rather strange new situation in which we ( as in we all) are= =20 dislocated, dislodged and at loss. This is very good. It means that we can= =20 leave behind 20th century monkeys on our backs. We all are blind in this=20 ubicomped environment. All means also IBM, Nokia, Philips. Any model of=20 business can easily go down in an environment that deals not with products= =20 and services that are currently harnassed in money making frameworks. Thus= =20 we can set ambitious goals, invent new terms, create new models of making= =20 money and giving it away, get rid of any notion of individual making and=20 legal and other claims to any kind of particular individual production,=20 make serious demands on the existing structures of power that harnass the= =20 energies with which we work, and claim a networked discourse (that we have= =20 to create) of a global mix of small and big media centres. This discourse= =20 should be simple, concrete and courageous. We need stories, good stories.= =20 As de Certeau says: There is some much belief, and so little credibility. III. As it is very difficult to educate and empower a large public on emerging= =20 technologies and not to frighten it into apathy, we need a clear spearhead= =20 to front our main umbrella under which we will loosely organize:=20 transparancy/optimum visibility towards disappearance/black box. This spearhead will be: wireless. Wireless as a social basic human right=20 of access to, as in water, food, shelter. Jose-Carlos Mariategui, Rob van Kranenburg, Gunalan Nadarajan, Shuddhabrata Sengupta, Geert Lovink. -- http://www.virtueelplatform.nl/ http://memling.ugent.be/staff/rob http://blogger.xs4all.nl/kranenbu/ mail: kranenbu@xs4all.nl text/sms: 0032 472 40 63 72 # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net