Michael Truscello on Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:46:25 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> for benjamin mako hill |
While I admire Hardt and Negri's Multitude, it must be noted that they do not seem to understand Open Source Software. For example, they reference the Open Source movement on page 301 (the passage you quoted); but the footnote (#105) is to Richard Stallman's Free Software, Free Society. They do not seem to understand the distinction between Free and Open Source Software. More problematically, they say Open Source involves the modification of software "without copyright." Well, that's obviously and comically untrue. They also use Eric Raymond as an exemplar of the "open-source movement" they are referencing (p.339); but Raymond's libertarian vision of OSS would seem to fly in the face of Hardt and Negri's previous 338 pages of complaints about capitalist exploitation. There is a relationship between FOSS and multitude. But I don't think Hardt and Negri have articulated it properly. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net