Benjamin Geer on Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:44:06 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> on nuclear diplomacy... |
On 21/01/06, brian carroll <neuron@electronetwork.org> wrote: > the War of Terror is actually the Palestinian/Israeli conflict writ-larg= e at the world-scale. While this might be an interesting analysis from a psychoanalytic point of view, if taken literally it runs the risk of blurring political realities, by, for example, implying that Palestinians are somehow responsible for, or that they benefit from, any acts of terrorism directed against the West. George Bush may say, "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists"[1], thus implying that that anyone anywhere who is opposed to some US interest belongs to some imaginary global "terrorist side" in a single worldwide conflict; that doesn't make it true. Palestinians have enough to deal with as it is; let's not imagine that kidnappings in Iraq or unmanned CIA air strikes against Pakistani villages are somehow their problem, too. Indeed, it is now commonplace for governments to use this very blurring of distinctions in order to garner support for whatever foreign or domestic policy they wish to pursue. Iranian president Ahmadinejad probably knows very well that the Israeli-Palestinian struggle isn't an "overriding concern to the average Iranian", and may simply be provoking an international crisis in order to gain the upper hand in a domestic power struggle.[2] Israel may be far less worried about Iran's nuclear weapons than about the possibility of losing its strategic importance to the US.[3] Moreover, if the Israeli-Palestinian conflict were really important to the US, it could have brought sufficient pressure and incentives to bear on all parties to resolve that conflict long ago. It does not do so precisely because the Palestinians have very little effect on US interests.[4] [1] George W. Bush, September 20, 2001, http://tinyurl.com/rrkj [2] Karim Sadjadpour and Ray Takeyh, "Behind Iran's Hard-Line on Israel", The Boston Globe, 23 December 2005, http://tinyurl.com/dn56s [3] Trita Parsi, "A challenge to Israel's strategic primacy", bitterlemons-international.org, 5 January 2006, http://tinyurl.com/acuym [4] Noam Chomsky, "The New World Order", 16 March 1991, http://tinyurl.com/= crkxg # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net