nettime's_embedded_controller on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:09:49 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> self-associated digest [x2: hardie, hopkins] |
Re: <nettime> "in association with nettime.org" "martin hardie" <martin.hardie@gmail.com> John Hopkins <jhopkins@commspeed.net> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:55:31 +0100 From: "martin hardie" <martin.hardie@gmail.com> Subject: Re: <nettime> "in association with nettime.org" netime by poll??? a nettime poll tax? On 11/29/06, Florian Cramer <fc-nettime@plaintext.cc> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 um 06:09:10 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Geert > Lovink: > > > > A one-day conference in association with nettime.org <www.nettime.org> > > > which explores the geographical and social structures of workers in > > > the Creative Industries and particularly the New Media sector > > How can a conference be made "in association with nettime.org" without > any poll on the list? All the more when it perpetuates that terribly > stupid meme of the "Creative Industries"? Or is this event a fraud and > refers to nettime without any authorization? > > It it time for some tactical media use of ubermorgen.com's "Injunction > Generator" against the organizers of that event? <...> -- #+34 666519359 # #http://openflows.org/~auskadi/ # #http://auskadi.civiblog.org # #http://auskadi.tk # #IRC: aussieman on #gentlegeeks at freenode.net # The lover wants the loved one with all its predicates, its being such as it is. The lover desires the as only insofar as it is such -this is the lover's particular fetishism. Giorgio Agamben The Coming Community - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:18:12 -0700 From: John Hopkins <jhopkins@commspeed.net> Subject: Re: <nettime> "in association with nettime.org" > CYBERSALON @ THE DANA CENTRE > DIGITAL WORK & CREATIVE MAPPING > The Science Museum's Dana Centre, 165 Queen's Gate, South Kensington, > London SW7 5HE <www.danacentre.org.uk> > Date: March 07 - to be announced > Cost: Cost and booking details to be announced > Nearest tubes: South Kensington/Gloucester Road On the front page of the Dana Center "The Dana Center is sexing up science for the masses" sheesh! And I find no mention of this project in the calendar for March 2007. > > > A one-day conference in association with nettime.org <www.nettime.org> >> > which explores the geographical and social structures of workers in >> > the Creative Industries and particularly the New Media sector at one level -- as an individual who doesn't often identify myself as a 'nettimer', more simply a participant in the nettime network -- who cares? although it would be interesting to know WHO exactly from nettime is facilitating this 'association.' on the other hand it could be interpreted as a cheap tactic of career promotion of an individual climber. what about insisting that there be a public synchronous forum available to nettime 'associatess' to actually input into the conference space... >How can a conference be made "in association with nettime.org" without >any poll on the list? All the more when it perpetuates that terribly >stupid meme of the "Creative Industries"? Or is this event a fraud and >refers to nettime without any authorization? good questions. I believe we are entitled to answers! Cheers John - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net