Morlock Elloi on Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:12:12 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> [Augmentology] _A Warcry for Birthing Synthetic Worlds_ |
There is a looming feeling that most of the development stopped in the last decade or so and what passes for development and "innovation" for the unwashed is simply commercial proliferation. The raison d'etre of startups today is to make Cisco or Google 0.1% richer. Some very powerful concepts have not yet re-surfaced (like Veronica - it was a fully distributed (because there were so many instances :) search engine for Gopher sites. Gnutella mimicks some of it today, but there are no mainstream apps.) What may be interesting is potential influence of ever-increasing edge computing power (things in end users' hands) and increasing bandwidth, on the 20th century networking topology. If any. Routing for example. Is it technologically required that this mail to nettime-l@kein.org moderator first travels from north america to Cologne, DE, subject to good will of several governments and commercial entities, and then gets picked by the moderator from who knows where? Is this centralised (server-based) architecture today technologically or commercially/politically mandated? Mesh self- and source-routed networks worked well on limited basis in 2000. Today, with all these gates crammed in tiny PDAs, access points, etc., it's totally conceivable that routing could be done without centralised servers and likely implemented at least in dense areas fully covered with wireless (and let's not forget IR). Moving terabytes without ever touching an ISP does not have technological barriers today. Yet it's not happening. There is not much incentive for self-organised networks these days. The point is that technology is not the barrier. The demand is the barrier. We simply cannot figure out WTF it is that we want from the technology. Most of technology today is like dark fiber - sitting there being available but of no use. There is really no new content class, save computer games and consumer-generated drivel. It's no wonder that 90+% of all bits moved is stolen content from 100 years old industry - movies. Web was big success primarily because it further automated the mail order concept - everything else was a side-effect. For the next big thing we will need something else to automate, and it seems that we are running out of ideas. Automating captivity - virtual worlds etc. - ain't it. > While that may be true, HTML was nothing special in that regard. When it > was invented, it was just another member of the large family of markup # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org