Patrice Riemens on Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:35:41 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Ippolita Collective: In the Facebook Aquarium, Part One Section 4, 2 |
Ippolita Collective: In the Facebook Aquarium. Part One, section 4, #2 For some time now, one can find software programs (codes) on social networks giving you full mastery of the golden rules of social engineering. These programme 'study' people's behaviour in order to extract useful information. They behave just as if they don't know, make errors, and lie. This is how /socialbots/ have been able to peneprate and compromise networks of trust on Facebook. But that is not all, less sophisticated approaches also exist. /Phishing/ for instance, is a widespread attack method, based on social engineering. To trap a prey, you need only to issue a warning like "alert! your Facebook account is under attack! Log in here now to change your password!". This way, even data that have not been shared with everybody become accessible. The resulting paradox is manifest: as each and sundry is supposed to be 'one and self', to be frank and upfront in telling what one likes and does, to reveal precisely where one is at any given time, and to faithfully update one's status without ambiguity, at the same time a sea of opportunity opens up for the ill-intentionned: a near infinite pool of totaly guileless people dying for someone's attention. Andy Warhol did predict that everybody would get her or his fifteen minutes of fame in the end - but this is far worse than anything imaginable. We are now in the age of difuse celebrity, accessible to anyone, but with very uncerrtain limits and demanding a permanent and relentless updating of one's profile, and a total trust in and transparency towards machines which know us better than we do ourselves and who can advise us at all times on products that are, as it were, specifically geared to our very own, personal purposes (#). The final stage of psychological involution on Facebook is therefore emotional and relational porn [13]. As /talk shows/ and /reality TV/ have amply demonstrated, snatching one's hair, crying, shouting, quarelling in public and trading insults, all this in front of spectators going to award marks and votes is deeply gratifying. Even a total nobody feels famous. No need for any proficiency on stage, in dancing, playing, singing or talking in public - or to be cute even. Suffice to go all out for it in front of the cameras, and to deliver ones' emotions, pure and undiluted. Facebook has intensified this worldwide project of emotional porn by introducing transparency tools in the form of boxes to be clicked on, forms to be completed and empty spaces to be filled with content. What's your current marital status? It's esential that everybody knows whether you are available, or engaged, or divorced and ready for adventure. Share your innermost feelings! What are your thoughts right now? Answer! Be transparent! What is at the same time amusing, and tragic, is the prevalent 'blog style' format, which makes that yesterday's informations lose their currency today, precluding any form of refresh.[?] Hence, the 'experience' is severely constrained into a kind of ever-lasting present. The past sinks inexorably into a deep hole, and nobody ever reads the older entries, unless, that is, in order to fish out the failings. After all, everybody's got a skeleton in the cupboard, don'they? The social intercourse is based on discretion and on lies, or rather, on half-truth and omissions. Yet your next boss, a suspicious pal, a piece of spyware, or a government to whom Facebook has sold your data would very much like to know more about your previous life. And since you've 'shared' everything with zeal, they'll get all they want in no time. Facebook's introduction of that new 'Timeline' feature, where one can insert images, notes, and contents pertaining to the period before one had an account, answers to the same logic: to make all aspects of someone's personality visible, in a clear, linear, sequential fashion - and no hiatus please. Here be no depth, and no complexity, no ambiguity. One has to be (here and now). The non-being vanishes, and a 'becoming' is simply a category outside the order. Contrarily to what happens in the outside world, things within social networks simply are there, they do not 'become'. A new state is superimposed on the previous one, and that's it, the previous state being simply deleted - for good. Your identity is fixed, even if it's changing. What do you prefer, males of females? Both? Nono, that's not allowed, you can tick one box only! /Transgender/ you say? No clue what you're talking about. Maybe that coders are now working on new categories, also well defined, for the next version of the software. But in case you've changed your mind, no problem. Here's a new identity and a fresh 'status', cancelling all the previous ones. In reality however, identities are complex bundles of pulsating characteristics, often in a dissonant way, and which are mutating, sometimes painfully, because the memory of who we were is built upon forgeting, selection, and self-remembering, and not on a kind of total recall of a fixed profile [14]. Facebook is the champ of emotional and relational porn: be transparent! Write, draw, or rather take pictures and make links with what concerns you in the most intimate manner, show your emotions in the most candid way possible, for a public that observes you in the most trivial way possible: see here the absolute apex of freedom of expression. (to be continued) Next time: The Performance Society --------- (#) cf 'How Target Figured Out ...' (Forbes): http://onforb.es/18UkfEM [13] pornography, from the greek <porne>, prostitute and <grafe>, drawing, script, document, litterally means to write on, or to draw prostitutes. Public self-representation, the sole object of narcissist pleasure, is akin to auto-prostitution. And as a marketing object within the public market of identities, the self-representation prostitutes itself in exchange for attention. [14] For a legal and historic overview of memory as forgetting in the digital world, see Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age, Princeton University Press, 2009. ----------------------------- Translated by Patrice Riemens This translation project is supported and facilitated by: The Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/portal/) The Antenna Foundation, Nijmegen (http://www.antenna.nl - Dutch site) (http://www.antenna.nl/indexeng.html - english site under construction) Casa Nostra, Vogogna-Ossola, Italy # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org