Eric Beck on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:56:45 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> what if we were all right but all wrong? |
On Sunday, August 30, 2015, Alex Foti <alex.foti@gmail.com> wrote: > What's important is that we ditch our ideological past to forge a > new, necessarily contradictory, unity that is able to wield power and beat > the eurocaste. It's better to be more than half right and win, than to be > totally right and lose;) > > i close with a mini-poll: Tsipras or Varoufakis? T or V? > > my vote: V The unimpeachable Dr V recently published a post < http://yanisvaroufakis.eu/2015/07/27/for-an-alliance-of-national-liberation-fronts-by-stefano-fassina-mp/> on his blog from a former Italian finance minister that said "we must build a broad alliance of national liberation fronts, starting from the eurozoneÂs Mediterranean ÂperipheryÂ, made up of progressive forces open to the cooperation of the democratic right wing sovranist parties," which V said was a debate we "shouldn't eschew." Of course this isn't just abstract speculation on V's part: his goverment had already formed such a front. Is this what your ditching of ideological pasts looks like? V has also called for and said he'd start a "pan-European workers network," something he optimistically proposes while migrants are dying by the dozens to get into Europe, which he has not a word about. Indeed, given his silence combined with his intellectual output and his record while governing, his desire to "reclaim Europe as a democratic realm of shared prospertity" would seem to exclude these migrants and promise to perpetuate the current European border regime. So while this new red-brown alliance might be effective, it's worth asking who will benefit by being "half right." Doubtful it will be migrants. The prospects for women, children, and queers is unlikely to be too sunny under the rule of "right wing sovranist parties." Retirees who will be impoverished by V et al's acceptable levels of austerity--i.e., the deals he negotiated as FM but that he seems to have escaped responsibility for--aren't likely to thrive under this contradictory unity. Your willingness to make sacrifices for victory is touching, but no thanks. Eric # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org