Andreas Broeckmann on Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:58:43 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Should use mobile phone data to monitor public health |
Hey Brian, folks, the question is well put - thanks for this.One aspect to add is that most of these data are already available to the GAFAM complex, and (more or less) voluntarily delivered to them by smartphone users all the time; so one may want to ask just _how_ making them available to governments, or publishing them, is worse, or different.
I would say _that_ these are definitely different trajectories of subjectivation, not least in the politico-philosophical perspective that you suggest; but I also believe that it will be worth specifying _how_ they are different. (Something that will also have to factored in is that, for various reasons, people have more or less trust in their respective governments, and in their fellow citizens.)
A question regarding the described activities to "use mobile phone data to monitor public health efforts": would they be superfluous (and the necessary data readily available) if the GAFAM complex (at this point, against the rules) collaborated with the respective governments, or if their accumulated data were requisioned?
Just speculating about who knows what... -a Am 18.03.20 um 20:34 schrieb Brian Holmes: <snip>
Presumably the app connects the individual's phone account and all its associated location info to a purpose-built database, while at the same giving the state the legal authority to use the data. Some accuracy gain in the geolocation is also claimed. The aim is to use the app after full-population lockdown is over, in order to halt the formation of new clusters. This would allow for the epidemiological management of individual mobility over the 18th-month period before a vaccine can be rolled out massively. Mobility-management enforced by the police, if you did notgather that already.
<snip>
In South Korea where this kind of app was first developed, all the information is made public, apparently to promote public trust in government (???). People have made map interfaces to visualize the data. Check it out: https://coronamap.site
<snip>
If applied in the Western societies - as the Italians intend - this would represent a fundamental change in the social contract. Combine it with unlimited state intervention in the economy and the mobilization of corporations and the military for production, health care and border closure, and you're looking at social changes far beyond what happened after 9/11. It has been obvious for years that Anthropocene conditions were going to force a transformation of the state, in order to deal with new problems emerging at the level of the population, and ultimately, of the species. Just as the neoliberal globalization paradigm is now clearly over, it seems that political liberalism itself will now undergo a sea-change in terms of the theoretical inviolability of individual rights. In the face of this, there seem to be two broad options for civil society response: -- Publicly refuse any infringement of previously existing rights, while privately maintaining the psycho-philosophical stance of the autonomous individual; or -- Participate critically in the elaboration of new population- and species-level norms for the being-in-common of a fully cybernetic society -- but on the ethical basis of what kind of "general intellect"???? If anyone is looking for a core problem in philosophy or political science to work on over the next few months, maybe this is it. I reckon the questions above are not exclusive alternatives. Instead they begin to mark out the contested/consensual space in which the new social paradigm will emerge. No ready-made answer on the basis of preexisting concepts and attitudes can fill that space. thoughtfully yours, Brian
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: