Dmytri Kleiner on Sat, 13 Mar 2021 05:32:23 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Disassociation from Michel Bauwens |
As some of you may already know, the P2P community has a major issue with P2P Foundation founder Michel Bauwens who has, in my view, turned the foundations Facebook groups and other forums into potential recruitment vectors for the "alt-right" and has created an environment where many people feel unwelcome and unsafe, including women, people of colour, and LGBT+ people.
As I have been involved with the P2P Foundation, Michel himself, and other parts of the P2P community for almost two decades, I have joined other colleagues who are alarmed by this right-wing pivot in signing this statement of dissociation.
https://p2p-left.gitlab.io/statement/ https://p2p-left.gitlab.io/statement/appendix/Please feel free to reach out to me if you have anything you want to talk about with regard to this unfortunate situation.
--- LETTER OF DISASSOCIATIONIn recent years the P2P Foundation has become the dominion of a single man: its founder Michel Bauwens. Despite its stated commitment to the “commons”, under Bauwens’ direction the P2P Foundation has increasingly come to represent an understanding of the commons as a place of white privilege and punitive male fragility.
Over the last few years, despite concern from long-standing members and close associates, Bauwens has transformed the P2P Facebook and P2P Foundation Wiki pages into what many of us perceive to be a pulpit for reactionary and conservative politics. This is done to the extent that members who identify as and with women, people of colour and the LGBT community have felt unheard, demeaned, disparaged and unsafe.
Bauwens’ posts and curation in the P2P Foundation’s Facebook group have increasingly promoted anti-left, anti-feminist, anti-justice “Intellectual Dark Web” and even alt-right videos and talk pieces.* This has been extended to include offshoots like the P2P Research Clusters and P2P Politics and Policy groups. Right-wing tropes are commonly found in the posts Bauwens curated in recent years, including: the claim that anti-racists and feminists promote “reverse racism” and “misandry”, that Black Lives Matter is a “neo racialist” movement seeking societal domination, that white privilege theory oppresses whites because of innate characteristics, that the transgender rights movement is “anti-woman”, and that social justice movements seek “inverse status hierarchies” or “reverse hierarchies of domination” in which white males are permanently at the bottom.
To many, Bauwens’ posts and curation regurgitate, in various different forms, the general reactionary trope that “those people don’t just want to be equal, they want to be superior.” Members of the community have repeatedly expressed dismay at this content which promotes many of the same dangerous tropes about “SJWs”, “cancel culture”, “snowflakes” and being “woke” that emerged from post-2014 GamerGate and Channer culture.* As the screenshots of his activity in the Appendix demonstrate, this is neither infrequent nor done in the spirit of advancing discussion of P2P ideas. In fact his constant focus on fighting “identity politics” is pursued to the near total exclusion of advancing the commons.
Bauwens claims the promotion of this content as “open curation” and “promoting discussion”. We believe such rationale is entirely disingenuous. The relevant articles and videos he posts are only from the alt right and “Intellectual Dark Web”, and are published without any critical contextualizing. On the contrary, while people are free to say hateful things like “trans women are men”, anyone who challenges the alt right material he presents or defends intersectional analysis, is denounced for apparent “racialism” and banned from the group. The curation is not “open”, but very much closed.
From our consistent observations over several years, we are concerned that Bauwens has turned the P2P Foundation’s Facebook groups and discourse on P2P into a reactionary and racist echo chamber. Perhaps most alarmingly, he recently announced that he would surrender leadership of the Facebook groups only to a leadership group that embraced the same —explicitly “anti-woke”— ideology, whose tenets are now being added to the P2P Foundation Wiki pages as guiding dogma.
As a result, P2P Foundation’s Facebook groups now exhibit characteristics and promote ideas that look towards right wing, reactionary views. We are concerned that this could potentially serve as a radicalization group, drawing people into far right recruitment.
We are compelled to take this action and produce a public letter now out of concern for the people who come to the P2P Foundation with a sincere interest in alternative production and distribution models and find themselves embroiled in what some have characterized as Michel Bauwens’ personal culture war. Furthermore, we are extremely worried that interested and passionate people may also be subjected to alt-right talking points which are carefully honed to sow division among people who could otherwise more easily combine forces towards commons based production.
As a result of this shift, Bauwens has been disinvited from high-profile events that would otherwise have benefited both the P2P Foundation and P2P or commons-based thought more generally. Rumours of his alt right radicalization are spreading rapidly and have caused concern among other organizations, Bauwens has publicly complained about being deplatformed, his “free speech” curbed, and has encouraged his followers to swarm those who disinvited him with mob criticism.
Michel Bauwens has done a great service to commons scholarship as an aggregator of prevailing tendencies—but he has overstepped his role as curator of the community. Historically, the commons always required the magnanimity of a sovereign whose authority presided over and protected the territory of the commons. This is perhaps the secret hegemony and patriarchal model in Bauwens’ Commons.
We, on the P2P left, want a commons scholarship which is radically intersectional and heterodox. Our “Left” commons is built on the principle of commoner’s control and a comprehensive understanding — which is race-conscious, feminist and socialist — of how power is produced and distributed.
P2P Left members are committed to exploring a more egalitarian P2P mode of exchange. This egalitarian approach understands that historical forces have shaped us powerfully and created many systemic differences that cannot be overlooked nor wished away by imagining some even playing field that is yet to be brought into existence. The very violent forces that have created inequity have shaped how we think and how we experience the world; any movement that does not attend to this and reflect the shifts required will sadly only end up replicating the very same violence and uneven distribution of power that we are fighting to transform.
We left to generate a group closer to the original aspirations of a P2P movement informed by a critical consciousness, sensitivity and the knowledge and practices of intersectional thinking forged in the struggle by those at the front lines. We welcome heterodox perspectives that may be less addressed in other forums including Marxist, Communist, Anarchist, Feminist, Postcolonial, Indigenous, Abolitionist, Racial Justice Positive, Queer, Hacker and Pirate.
This is not about Michel Bauwens being wrong, this is about safety for people of colour, LGBT and women in the community. We emphasize that all efforts (including personal, offline appeals) to bring Michel to a place where reasonable, responsible discussion on these issues can safely be had, have failed.
Therefore we the undersigned in the P2P community disassociate ourselves from Michel Bauwens, and we ask others to consider doing the same.
See → Appendix P2P LEFT March 2021Kevin Barron, ICT Director (retired) Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California Santa Barbara.
Joanna Boehnert, lecturer, designer, Nottingham, United Kingdom.Kevin Carson, researcher of postcapitalist transition, northwest Arkansas.
Rebecca Conroy, artist and independent scholar, Sydney, Australia. Elisabeth De Laet, artist, CHT/Totalism.org hackbase, Canary Islands. Baruch Gottlieb, artist, curator and writer, Berlin, Germany. Dmytri Kleiner, software developer, Berlin, Germany. Cindy Kohtala, researcher of peer production, Helsinki, Finland.Alekos Pantazis, researcher, Tallinn University of Technology & core member, P2P Lab.
David Potočnik, CHT/Totalism.org hackbase, Canary Islands.Sharon Prendeville, Senior Lecturer, Loughborough University and Co-Founder of OSCEdays.
Poor Richard, creator and first admin of P2P Facebook group.Penny Travlou, lecturer and Co-Director Feminist Autonomous Centre for Research, Athens, Greece.
Jayu U, translator, Brazil.Dr. Jedediah Walls, former research practicum intern with the P2P Foundation.
McKenzie Wark, Professor, New York, NY.To add your name to this letter of disassociation in solidarity, please email p2pleft [at] protonmail.com.
* The discourse mentioned includes articles from conservative media celebrities, particularly from the US; non-academic, non-journalistic, at times explicitly racist, videos on YouTube that researchers have classified as belonging to or adjacent to the ‘alt right’; conservative mass media tabloids; articles from Quillette and Areo online magazines; and “Intellectual Dark Web” commentary videos. Figures as authors and speakers include Bari Weiss, Jesse Singal, Lindsay and Pluckrose, Andy Ngo, and the Rubin Report. Quillette and Areo are conservative magazines for editorials, opinions and non-peer reviewed articles marked by anti-feminism and concern with “anti-whiteness” and Quillette particularly publishing on eugenics and ‘race realism’. (For more on the IDW, see e.g. this Vox article; this Data and Society report; and Lewis (2020).) An excessive immersion into this online reading and video material, which stimulates anger against women and BIPOC as “causes” of economic deprivation, is known as being “redpilled”. (See this NYT article; Zuckerberg (2018).)
The increasing frequency of events such as GamerGate (which involved death threats to the women involved) and mass killings by radicalized white nationalists, indicates that what appear to some to be mere “online interactions” on social media have very real world consequences. Moreover, given the reputation of Facebook as actively facilitating election manipulation, dissemination of hate groups and unethical practices related to citizens’ personal data, the sheer amount of time spent on keeping P2P commons practitioners beholden to a surveillance capitalist platform without careful moderation to protect its own members is highly questionable. (See e.g. DiResta (2018).)
-- Dmytri Kleiner @dmytri # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: