Re: <nettime> nettime-l Digest, Vol 163, Issue 12

[Anya Sophe Behn <anya@aliencranberry.com>]

Molly,

I love this if they are really working to impose a structure within the creation of software and the random, unexplored consequences decisions made by most (mainly white men) people creating it.
It’s an extremely unfriendly environment to anyone but young white men, as Silicon Valley culture believes the lie that the most money will be made from the idiot zuckerbergs model, when in reality most successful startups are created by people with experience.

The Silicon Valley culture, and by necessity the software et al created by it, is extreme capitalism with profit prioritized above all else, and F the humans who haven’t pillaged everyone else and gotten too rich to be tolerated.

+a+
AS Behn

>   1. deep humanities initiative (Molly Hankwitz)
>   2. Re: deep humanities initiative (Ted Byfield)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:11:51 -0700
> From: Molly Hankwitz <mollyhankwitz@gmail.com>
> To: nettime-l <nettime-l@mx.kein.org>
> Subject: <nettime> deep humanities initiative
> 
> By way of - perhaps this list will take an interest in this initiative:
> 
> 
> What is ?Deep Humanities??
> <https://www.sjsu.edu/humanitiesandarts/Faculty_Development_Resources/What_Is_Deep_Humanities.html>
> 
> ? By Dr. Revathi Krishnaswamy ?
> 
> Silicon Valley?s tech titans not only dazzled the world with brilliant
> technological inventions and innovations, but also captivated the world?s
> imagination with idealistic talk of social justice and utopian visions of a
> brave new world.  As the tech boom transformed Silicon Valley into a gilded
> gated community, the economic, political, and cultural power of the tech
> titans remained largely unquestioned.  But the alarming invasion of
> privacy, misinformation, ?fake news,? sexual harassment, racial
> discrimination, and economic disparity in recent times are raising profound
> and pressing questions about Silicon Valley (Berlin 2017, Cohen 2017,
> Greene 2018, Kleeman 2017, Lyons 2018, Spencer 2018).
> 
> Is technology the answer to humanity?s problems or a threat to humanity as
> we know it? Who gets to define technology or determine its role in the
> world? Are social media and e-commerce enriching or impoverishing us?  Will
> automation spread the pleasure of leisure to all or will robots take our
> jobs? How are AI and other emerging technologies redefining what and how it
> means to be human in the digital age? Are the tech titans promoting
> empathy, diversity, and inclusion or embracing a radical libertarian
> individualism hostile to women and other minorities? Is the tech industry
> optimizing for profit and disrupting for dominance at the expense of our
> humanity, environment, democracy, decency, and morality? What role can the
> Humanities & Arts play in these turbulent times?
> 
> All too often, the Humanities & Arts are reduced to ?soft skills,?
> ?business ethics,? and ?product design,? handmaids to the ?hard,?
> male-dominated/masculinized STEM fields. Humanistic traditions of
> creativity and contemplation are appropriated to boost corporate
> productivity and profit while complex biocultural practices of wellbeing
> and happiness are extracted to enhance elite health and fitness. A
> delirious presentism spread by corporate media/communication networks,
> induces historical amnesia, leaving us awash in information without memory,
> outrage without perspective. The crisis is so serious that even tech
> companies eager to develop more disruptive futuristic technologies like
> biochips and AI-bots are now beginning to turn to the humanities/arts for
> answers and insights. Recent moves by NSF, Partnership for AI, Mozilla, and
> Google to integrate ethics into computer science curriculum and reward work
> in socially conscious product design attest to this turn.  In the face of
> such immense challenges, there is an urgent need to reinvent the humanities
> & arts, redefine their relationship to STEM, and revitalize their role in
> our lives. The Deep Humanities & Arts Initiative is conceived to fill this
> need.
> 
> Deep Humanities is not an updated or upgraded version of the old humanities
> but a critical posthumanism predicated on deep interdisciplinary and
> intercultural engagement (Botz-Bornstein  2012, Bannerji & Paranjape 2016,
> Jackson 2017). Deep Humanities radically restructures the foundational
> relationship between human, nature, and machine. Instead of a bounded human
> entity exalted to the center or the top, Deep Humanities envisions a more
> interconnected or dispersed being situated in proportion to and imbricated
> in ?right relations? with the Other (animal, plant, machine). As part of
> this fundamental restructuring, Deep Humanities deconstructs the hegemonic
> Cartesian model of the human (as "above nature and other than
> machine") historically produced and universalized by European Enlightenment
> thought (Rees 2018), and reconstructs a more complex, integrated, symbiotic
> model by crossing disciplinary boundaries between the human sciences/the
> natural sciences/engineering, and drawing critical insights from other
> emerging paradigms and alternative traditions of thought.
> 
> Paralleling the notion of deep learning in computer science and deep
> ecology in environmental studies, Deep Humanities draws on deep structures
> of history, myth, and culture, networks of language, communication, and
> interpretation, patterns of affect, belief and bias, representations of
> cognition and consciousness, theories of ethics, art and aesthetics to
> develop multilevel, interdisciplinary, cross-cultural models of complex
> problems in order to reach higher levels of critical thinking,
> experiencing, understanding, and solving.  At the most general level, Deep
> Humanities seeks to reconceptualize culture itself as a form of
> (artificial) intelligence that enhances and extends human capabilities. At
> its most profound, Deep Humanities aims to bring our cumulative accumulated
> knowledges about the practice of being human to engage the urgent issues of
> our times.
> 
> Key topics/issues the Deep Humanities & Arts Initiative proposes to tackle
> (in alphabetical order):
> 
>   - Bias: social, cultural, and technological, including algorithmic bias;
>   common sense and critical thinking in ML/AI.
>   - Culture: not as a stable set of practices to be manipulated or
>   overcome, but as a dynamic site of struggle for meaning; as a form of
>   ?artificial intelligence? that enhances and extends human intelligence and
>   capabilities.
>   - Design: ethical, affective, inclusive, and sustainable but not human
>   centered; instead of placing human at the center/top, Deep Humanities
>   proposes to place the human in proportion to and in *right relations* with
>   the nonhuman (animal, plant, machine).
>   - Ethics: ethical ways of conceiving and connecting with the Other all
>   its planetary diversity; integrating ethics into STEM/STEM education,
>   business, politics, planning, and policy.
>   - Human/Non-human: scientific, philosophical, cultural and religious
>   conceptions/models of the human and the non-human (including Nature and
>   Machine) as well as the relationship between the two; deconstructing the
>   Cartesian model and reconstructing a more complex, integrated understanding
>   using insights from emerging paradigms and alternative traditions
>   (cross-cultural medical humanities, deep ecology and environmental
>   humanities)
>   - Identity: as difference/relation rather than essence; formation,
>   representation; construction in virtual space, through social media; role
>   of alterity/the Other
>   - Imagination: uniquely human? biological, cognitive, affective,
>   cultural, artistic and technological understandings and expressions of
>   imagination, play and creativity.
>   - Language/communication ? communication/language in human/non-human;
>   human cognition/intelligence as well as AI and machine learning, including
>   notions of context, common sense, and critical thinking.
>   - Reality ? conceptions, representations, and models of reality
>   (realism, reality, verisimilitude, virtual reality, fiction, fantasy);
>   relationship between reality, representation, fact, fiction, and truth.
>   - Security/Privacy: issues around transparency, access, use/misuse of
>   data; understandings of privacy/post-privacy; cyberwar/cybersecurity
>   - Time/Space ? phenomenological, philosophical, psychological,
>   historical, technological, social, cultural, mythic conceptions,
>   experiences, and uses of time/space (fast vs slow, right time, place vs
>   space, dwelling, habitus, ecosystem).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The Ensuing Conversations
> 
> Position Papers from Spring 2018 One-Day Symposium
> 
> Andrew Blanton (Digital Media Arts, SJSU ? Position Paper)
> Dr. Winncy Du (Director of the Robotics, Sensor, and Machine Intelligence
> Laboratory, SJSU ? Position Paper)
> Neeti Mehta (VP, Brand Strategy & Initiatives, Automation Anywhere ?
> Position Paper)
> Dr. Janet Stemwedel (Philosophy, SJSU ? Position Paper)
> Dr. Daniel Susser (Philosophy, SJSU ? Position Paper)
> Rhonda Holberton (Digital Media Arts, SJSU ? Position Paper)
> Dr. Claire Komives (Chemical Eng/Biomedical Ethics, SJSU ? Position Paper)
> Manjula Menon, (Fiction author; Physics, Electrical Engineering, Finance ?
> Position Paper)
> Dr. Anand Vaidya (Philosophy, SJSU ? Position Paper)
> 
> 
> molly hankwitz - she/her
> http://bivoulab.org

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: