Barbara Jung on Wed, 23 Oct 96 14:46 MET |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re:nettime:Ambient, Techno, Internet - Harald Fricke |
Harald Fricke first draws a parallel between techno an the internet because both have become mass phenomena. This is followed by a detailed critique of ambient music as *musical furniture*, which leads to the thesis that the internet doesn«t >extend the state of the artjust like ambient music doesn«t. Be it or not: to look for the reason in accusing both of using electronic equipment without any limitations concerning the contents is certainly a mistake. Then he finally comes to the point: >The fact that the two media have come together may be part of their >failure.Although it«s beyond me how he comes to such a conclusion on account of the things he said, he tries to substantiate it with the example of another mixture of two spheres: techno and art. That doesn«t work, because it«s a totally different situation, but it made me write something about this connection and the problem in general: Hermetic subsystems seem to have granted autonomy in a way, that it seems incredible how someone can dare to have something to say in different provinces. A strict separation of these ranges, though it would be desirable, fails, because one just has *one* body and one cannot split oneself in separated identities, where the particular social group doesn«t know about the existence of the other identities. By the way, one can rather call a society with hermetic subsystems (if one sees it as an entity) multiphrenic than an individual with several interests. But I see the mixture of different discourses with suspicion as well: if it is in the techno-scene, where a high-class, formalistic and structural branch of art of the 80s (with *pure* photography!) is revived to show that techno *really is* intelligent, serious music ... (that can be seen in the advert design of labels and events) ... if in the art scene, where (how H. Boehringer formulated it) "pop serves as a vampyristic refreshment of a bloodless autopoiesis". The author of the preface of the last "Kunstforum" could not prevent himself from adding a long list of credits to his text, like it is usual on records, - obviously to demonstrate that he«s equipped with the necessary measure of "respect" and emotionality. The "theory-scene" seems to be in an intermediate space: fanzine writers (if they are classed with) enrich their reviews with avantgarde paradigms, in the same degree they tend to judge music by linear-innovative, conceptual measures, according to the joking "you would buy a dog«s bark if it had been released on WARP". More academic (art-)theorists often cannot distinguish between *junk* out of the question (which they although find important because of its supposed "pop-qualities") and inventive experiments. They are not deep enough into it to make out the difference. The connection of several fields, how it is tried by people (like me) who take up no special place, was certainly tackled too lax and too naive. All attempts to show art during parties or to make music in an art context, although the motive was at first a harmless idealism, seem to have failed. It is in the same way absurd, when music is judged by a theoretical point of view or when a theory is based on (undigested) pop-phenomena. The general problem of the connection of different scenes is in my eyes, that people usually are first and foremost part of *one* scene and see the other scene through the glasses of the first one. That someone who acts on different terrains equally cannot reach the degree of an one-sided specialized person in a single area, is just partly true: apart from the fact that a mere technical professionality is made an absolute, a change of perspective, which leads to new statements, is often blocked to specialists. What could be the consequences? I think there will be no way back to the pure intellect, undefiled by popular culture. So we have to live with these amalgamations, hoping that the different scenes depending on different *media*, not contents, will dissolve, because there are not enough people left who belong to a single one. Barbara Jung ################################ e-mail: jung-b@hrz.uni-kassel.de url: http://www.uni-kassel.de/fb7/fgfin/jpage/ Tel.: +49(0)561/812997 Fax: +49(0)561/8043681 -- * distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission * <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, * collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets * more info: majordomo@is.in-berlin.de and "info nettime" in the msg body * URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@is.in-berlin.de