Frank Fremerey on Mon, 5 Oct 1998 11:35:23 +0200 (MET DST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> The need for public backbones |
*** The Need For Public Backbones *** preliminary message We live in a world where borders - real or imagined - limit our ability to move, think and create far beyond our actual potential. Some of these borders are of a natural, physical kind, borders we can not topple - real ones. Others are constructed, recognizable by the need to enforce them - imagined ones. I do not think we should limit ourselves to borders imagined by others, but to a certain extent I think we should respect some borders which are imagined, but through enforcement accepted as real by some of the other inmates of our planet. Public Bandwidth The Internet started in the US, although in 1947 some Europeans were already discussing things like 'Hypertext'. It was also the US who cradled the Web, who made the Internet take off, after - again - a European turned an idealistic approach into a working model on which Marc Andreeson and others created Mosaic and later Netscape, which really paved the way to make the general public aware of the fact that this network existed for nearly 30 years then. But in the US, adding to the impact the Internet already has naturally, there was the Universities Network, which was opened to the public and thus opened a space for experiment, a space for students turning small companies, turning Public Offerings whichof the echoes were heard worldwide. So - politicians - if you want to keep unemployment-rates low by exploiting more of the potential of your peoples and replacing obsolete industries with more future-bearing enterprises you should certainly follow the example of the US and - interestingly enough - *Bavaria*. Bavaria is better known for charging a US-provider for making access to porn-sites easy and thereby earning money, charging the customers for every single hour downloading smut from the Web and the newsgroups. Of course this approach is questionable and I do not subscribe to the point of view that a network-access-provider is responsible for things shipped through the infrastructure he makes available. But anyway: there is a certain truth in the words of the judge that should certainly be reconsidered. *** End of first thesis: Public Backbones bring down unemployment rates, by encouraging ideas to be turned into future-bearing enterprises. *** Space for Experiment It seems to have been a major topic at 'Art Servers Unlimited', that there has to be built an infrastructure to support net.artists or people providing access to arts and literature through the Internet (which is the case for my company and http://heinrich-heine.com). Yes, we should not starve and yes, there should be funding - public or private - for net.art. In the first thesis I pointed out that Public Backbones are a way to help ideas grow into enterprises. And because the net sells through the content in it, the creative community has to find a way to make the access-providers pay for the content we create; or, as I put it in my lecture on net.radio days '98, the people who visit the sites: the viewers, listeners and readers. In contrast to the companies there is no general interest in the net.art-community to make a profit. Most of the community only want to have a space for their work, plus enough money to travel and meet the people necessary to continue, to pay for food, rent, telephone, electricity, hardware. Some of the artwork - maybe most of it - is not, nor has it ever been, designed to meet the taste of the masses. MTV or CNN or Microsoft are doing a better job at this and we do not tend to compete with them. But has art not ever been able to attract the wealthy few and make them pay? - People who later gave their collections to museums and thereby made them available to the masses who were then ready to open themselves to yesterday's way of expressing the current problems in a creative way? *** End of second thesis: access to network sells through content. Content attractive to the masses sells through page-views, content attractive to few sells through charging the few who can afford to make the content available to everyone interested in it. *** The Retired Creators Have you seen John Walker's pages at http://bavard.fourmilab.ch/earthview/vplanet.html (part of his Web-project 'Index Librorum Liberorum' which translates to ' Index of the free books')? Then you know what creative people can do for the Internet and its content, when they have setteled, when they have no trouble anymore to pay their providers who provide food, telephone or Internet-service or whatever to them. OK, John Walker is special, because he was also creative in his enterpreneur-career (he created Autodesk). But there are many John Walkers, big and small and - by the way - did you think about the 100.000.000.000 bucks Bill Gates may have earned, when he will have retired in two or three years? He says he will give at least 95% of it to charity (which is the other job that will keep him occupied for the rest of his life and still leave enough to him and his family to make a living basically). Don't you think he will put a little bit of it into the net-content-creating folks? Do you think 'Corbis' is just another profit-center and not also something he has a real interest in? The smaller creators are people who might have earned five or ten thousand bucks a month for most of their working life. People who studied - i.e. showed a certain interest in topics not directly connected to their working-experience. A lot of them have books in their drawers or paintings or compositions and just did not dare to go public with these during their lives. These 'hindered artists' would enjoy encouragement to publish from the net.art-community and be ready to open their purses in return. Those are the assets of 'inter.fund'. Those are the people to talk to, the people to create privately funded Public Backbones by helping with their time, experience and - yes - money. *** End of third thesis: Encourage the wealthy but shy creative people to publish their work and you will find a way to finance yours. *** to be continued Frank Fremerey Founder and CEO HOME - HochschulMediennetz Deutschland Bonn, Germany, 11 July 1998 --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl