nettime's_digestive_system on Fri, 26 Mar 1999 19:43:34 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> the business of words digest |
McKenzie Wark <mwark@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au> Re: ADMINISTRATIVE: Expiring Words and Phrases [v0.1 03191999] "we at nettime" <weatnettime@hotmail.com> ICANN - or the Accountability of Esther Dyson "Name.Space" <pg@name-space.com> NSOL Possesses No Lock on Domain Registry or Registrar Businesses - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:36:18 +1100 (EST) From: McKenzie Wark <mwark@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au> Subject: Re: <nettime> ADMINISTRATIVE: Expiring Words and Phrases [v0.1 03191999] The list of expiring terms is very comprehensive, however, one omission that needs rectifying is 'convergence' -- clearly a term with underlying structural difficulties, rather than a problem of mere over use. I would als like to volunteer a term from my own writing -- 'vector' for overuse on my part. yours in compliance __________________________________________ "We no longer have roots, we have aerials." http://www.mcs.mq.edu.au/~mwark -- McKenzie Wark - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: "we at nettime" <weatnettime@hotmail.com> Subject: ICANN - or the Accountability of Esther Dyson Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 17:22:59 PST ICANN - or the accountability of esther dyson "The domain name identity crisis is worrisome right now because of the recent untimely death of Jon Postel, the guru of Internet names and numbers. Not nearly filling Postel's shoes, we have the new Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN. There is much controversy about ICANN. We know who died, but who made Esther Dyson chairman? Is this some plot of U.S. military intelligence? Are large corporations taking over the Internet? " Bob Metcalfe http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9901/18/idcrisis.idg/index.html it would be definetly interesting to hold a public file on powerful people like esther dyson. today conspiracies are more all day practise than fringe theory and paranoia can be the basis for a successful business model. it is time to demystify conspiracies and put it into a historic context. isn't it partly the lack of good journalism which leads to 'conspiracy theories'? maybe. but it is also the lack of people who are curious enough to try to read between the lines and make up their own mind. in case of the domain name game: what kind of 'power' (besides the few millions which go to network solutions) drives the interest into this issue? only identity and fame? only money? names hold an irreducable magic, irreducable by linguistics or nitpicking technocritics. on the net they also serve as markers and keys to an distributed memory technique, for humans and machines. the power of dns is that domain names organize the imaginative spaciality of cyberspace as well as it is a central element for the hyperlinked dynamic datastructure of the web. control DNS and you control the surfer's minds AND the integrity of the net as a media for political action. "the revolution will be not digitized". but who speaks about revolution today? perhaps people who are traumatized from the 60ies, cold warriors and fanatic anti-communists, Jeffersonian illumintati, messianic millenialists, cold blooded high capitalists, extremely cautious jews, fact is: without adresses the internet would at least temporaly break down. the ones who decide this have control over an extreme power. that dyson says to the government "hands off the internet" sets up the question of her accountability. in who's interest does she act? who put her into power? the system put slowly into function by esther dyson and her marketing apperatus is an international board of trustees which are is in no way democratically legitimized. ICANN is one of the most dubious AGOs (anti-governmental organisations) on the internet and definetly worth a look for people interested in 'net politics'. it may show a way how power and political will organizes itself in the next century around the control of specific standards and technolgies. there is a simple cause why to centralize the domain name system around an us american secret service. in case of a political crisis where the net plays a certain strategic role for the 'enemy' it is possible to switch off the root servers and gain an important ammount of time until the functionality of DNS is reestablished in other ways. it is a pure myth that the net is designed to survive a military crisis. given the current structure of the root services it is highly vulnerable to central control. and as you know in the military doctrines of today the 'inner politics' play an important role. from this maximum point of power there are many derrivatives, the organisation of the domain name system as a problem of power is also an example to solve other kinds of structural conflicts of the internet as a truly global infrastructure. given the assumption that DNS has a high strategic priority on many agendas one has to be radically naive scenario that that undemocratic forces try to gain control over this technology in their interest to control extreme political situations. not only since the fall of the eastern block there is a well known danger, that (pseudo) democracies are subverted by those who abuse the power of the 'own' secret police forces. in this way it would be enough to build up mirror sites of the TLD-DNS which are not in the control of an US private company with a unclear background or a international board of trustees which are untrusted by the international public. paul garrin's name.space project is a mind opener and early example of technology activism bordering between outsider movement and a heroic delusion of free media. even if it fails it is at least material for a explosive best-seller of true technopolitical fiction. >>> login weatnettime@hotmail.com *assword aresohappy Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: "Name.Space" <pg@name-space.com> Subject: NSOL Possesses No Lock on Domain Registry or Registrar Businesses Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:10:20 +0000 http://fast.quote.com/fq/quotecom/news?story=9529627&symbols=nsol Asensio & Co.: NSOL Possesses No Lock on Domain Registry or Registrar Businesses PR Newswire, Thursday, March 25, 1999 at 08:46 NEW YORK, March 25 /PRNewswire/ -- The following is being issued by Asensio & Company, a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, CRD number 31742: Investors may be buying Network Solutions, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NSOL) stock believing the company possesses some market advantage, recurring income or proprietary technology that has allowed it to create, and will allow it to grow, its Internet domain name registry and registrar business. We found no reasonable basis for these beliefs. NSOL's domain name business has been and remains totally reliant on a 7-year-old U.S. federal government contract, which is expiring and will not be renewed. We believe that NSOL's management has purposely disseminated misleading information, and failed to disclose material negative information, that has led investors to believe that the expiration of this contract will be postponed or that it cannot be entirely and easily terminated. Investors have also been led to believe that even if the contract is terminated, NSOL's business value will continue to grow. These expectations are baseless and false. NSOL's expiring contract precluded any other company anywhere in the world from registering .com domain names. The termination of NSOL's contract will eliminate all barriers to entry and NSOL's competitive advantage. As a result, regardless of the performance of the Internet stocks, we believe that NSOL's current $110 stock price, which places it among the elite top ten most valued Internet companies, is grossly overvalued. Investors may also believe that NSOL will retain the registry business indefinitely and that it will be valuable. The registry must be operated on a cost plus basis. We estimate the total cost to operate the registry at less than $3 per name per year. We believe that the registry will ultimately be transferred to an ICANN accredited cooperative. In any case, we do not believe that the temporary, testbed registry price will remotely approach NSOL's $16 target. As a result, NSOL will quickly become one of hundreds of registration services operating in a small dollar value, low margin, no-value-added business. We see little or no uncertainty as to any of these outcomes. NSOL is trading at a large premium to legitimate Internet stocks, which unlike NSOL have promising rather than diminishing futures. Because of NSOL's rapidly deteriorating fundamentals, non-Internet owner-management and its monopolistic image in the Internet community worldwide, we believe NSOL will trade lower regardless of the performance of other Internet stocks. Even assuming a strong Internet equity market, we believe that NSOL will trade below $40 per share after the testbed is concluded and well below $20 per share after the contract is terminated. These price targets assume that Internet stocks will continue to be valued at current or higher relative levels. NSOL has a serious dilemma. NSOL must persuade investors that it can continue to control the domain name market and generate sufficient growth to justify its market capitalization. Meanwhile, NSOL must comply with its agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce that requires NSOL to relinquish its control over the domain name market and to temporarily operate a cooperative registry on a low margin, cost plus a reasonable return basis. NSOL's situation creates an even greater conflict for its analysts. To defend NSOL's valuation, NSOL's analysts must make the incongruent pair of claims that the domain name market will continue to have wide margins and rapid growth, but that it is unattractive to other competitors. These are the preposterous and weak assumptions that underpin NSOL's analyst recommendations. Asensio & Company, Inc. is a New York-based institutional investment bank specializing in corporate valuations and equity research. Asensio & Company also specializes in investigating fraudulent stock promotions and publishing research on grossly overvalued companies. A complete documented history of Asensio's published work with fraudulent securities transactions is available on the Internet at http://www.asensio.com. Asensio & Company is actively engaged in short selling and advises its clients on securities it believes are overvalued. Today, Asensio & Company initiated coverage of Network Solutions, Inc. with a Strong Sell and Short Sell recommendation. Asensio & Company also issued an institutional research report on Network Solutions. These reports are available on Asensio & Company's Internet home page located at http://www.asensio.com. This report should not be construed as an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. This report has been prepared from original sources and data which we believe to be reliable but accuracy is not guaranteed. This research report was prepared by Asensio & Company, Inc. whose stockholders, officers and employees may from time to time acquire, hold or sell a position in the securities mentioned herein. Asensio & Company, Inc. may act as principal for its own account or may sell or buy to or from its customers the securities described herein. Asensio & Company, Inc. may from time to time perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any company mentioned in this report or its affiliates. SOURCE Asensio & Company, Inc. -0- 03/25/99 /CONTACT: Manuel P. Asensio of Asensio & Company, Inc., 212-702-8800/ --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl