nettime's_indigestive_system on Wed, 31 Mar 1999 11:12:10 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> yugolsavia digest [markovic, smith] |
Slobodan Markovic <twiddle@EUnet.yu> Total Madness Again Matthew Smith <matt@fl.aec.at> Re: <nettime> Re: the personal is political? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: "Slobodan Markovic" <twiddle@EUnet.yu> Subject: Total Madness Again Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 14:09:22 +0200 NATO blew it this time. Their actions in Yugoslavia are showing fundamental misunderstanding of Kosovo crisis and Balkan mentalities. After CNN reported 500.000 Albanian refugees on Kosovo, Clinton responded, on a press conference, that NATO will strike now with even more power in attempt to stop killings. Totally wrong. Everybody is potential victim on Balkans. In this moment of time Albanians are fleeing from their homes (around 2000 is crossing Yugoslav borders daily). Just few years ago around 300.000 Serbs fled from Bosnia after Croatian military operation The Storm. That was the revenge. And Albanian exodus now is also some kind of revenge. NATO attacks gave perfect excuse to Slobodan Milosevic to ban all independent media in Serbia, homogenize nation behind him and hit Kosovo with much larger police + military forces. If there was no NATO attack we would still have low scale conflict on Kosovo that allows peace negotiations. Now everything is more or less finished. Just like after The Storm, nothing will be the same, including possible future negotiations... not to mention life on Kosovo... Greetings, Slobodan Markovic | http://solair.eunet.yu/~twiddle Internodium Project | http://www.internodium.org.yu - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: "Matthew Smith" <matt@fl.aec.at> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 06:40:17 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Re: <nettime> Re: the personal is political? Dear Richard Barbrook. The problematic part of the whole mess in the balkans is, as far as you or any other west european/north american should be concerned, the fact that NATO has attacked a sovreign country without UN mandate. All the spin about this being a humanitarian mission must be ignored, since the logic does not work out. It has been stated a number of times on this list, but i will do it again: If the motivation of NATO was to save lives and stop ethnic warfare, then why does it call Turkey "an esteemed ally" for e.g. and support Turkey in its fight against the PKK? Also, please refrain from using such harsh expressions on people who actually think be4 they write, and try to weigh there judgement be4 ranting off on mainstream EU/NATO propagande BULLSHIT. matt vehicle.aec.at---www.firstfloor.org---www.enemy.org---ur.creditcard.nr.here --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl