Han Speckens on 8 Dec 2000 20:06:19 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-nl] Merkenstabiliteit |
Hallo Nettime,
Dan nu een introductie in het heden en over de merken die
verder zullen doordringen in het publieke domein als eigenaar van de sociale
dienst of als organisatie voor rioolheffing, kunstsubsidies en denk bijvoorbeeld
ook eens aan de marktwerking in de gezondheidssector. In de media wordt het
toch altijd meer voorgesteld als een politieke keuze door PvdA of D66 maar het
zijn wel degelijk thema's die een internationale oorsprong
hebben.
volgt een korte tekst van een engelse collega over de
mondialisering van het merk>
The year 2000 is to be brought to a close by the opening round of the auctioning of selected public services to the world's most predatory - mainly US - corporations. This process is sanctioned by GATS (the General Agreement on Trade in Services), and items that could be on offer range from Mexico's telecommunications to Britain's schools. The deadline being offered to governments by the World Trade Organisation is this month. GATS is a set of international regulations which will require national governments to open up public services to the market. Its aim is to remove all internal government controls over service delivery that are barriers to trade. In effect, it is the framework for a global programme of privatisation. GATS identifies 160 sectors to be subject to its rules. They range from hi-tech telecommunications to emptying the dustbins. They would make government actions to keep local control over these services illegal. This new machinery of liberalisation comes at a time when profits in manufacturing are falling and corporations are hungry for new markets. AT&T, Arthur Anderson, the Chase Manhattan bank, IBM, the energy company ENRON, accountants Price Waterhouse Cooper and Ernst and Young and many others, as democratic as a band of feudal lords, are salivating in anticipation. What power has voting had over this international regime which will, in the long run, transform the quality of our lives? None. On the other hand, people did originally vote for the services now being sold. They still do. David Hartridge, director of the WTO Services Division, indicates where power lies: "Without the enormous pressure generated by the American financial services sector, particularly companies like American Express and Citicorp, there would have been no GATS." http://www.commondreams.org/views/120500-106.htm>
Published on Tuesday, December 5, 2000 in the Guardian of London We Need To Be Guerrillas by Hilary Wainwrigh |