Tillmann Allmer on 19 Sep 2001 11:02:52 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[rohrpost]Fwd: The World Trade Center and the Rise of the Security State |
fand ich ganz interessant... Gruss - Tillmann Allmer >X-Flags: 0000 >Delivered-To: GMX delivery to tallmer@gmx.de >X-Sender: ctech@alcor.concordia.ca (Unverified) >Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:19:23 -0500 >To: ctheory@concordia.ca >From: CTHEORY EDITORS <ctech@alcor.concordia.ca> >Subject: Event-scene 98 - The World Trade Center and the Rise of the > Security State >X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by clyde.concordia.ca >id OAA29921 >Sender: owner-ctheory@concordia.ca >Reply-To: CTHEORY EDITORS <ctech@alcor.concordia.ca> >X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by clyde.concordia.ca >id WAA20442 >X-Modified-Forwards: 2D.Paging address tallmer@gmx.de > > _____________________________________________________________________ > CTHEORY THEORY, TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE VOL 24, NO 3 > > Event-scene 98 09/18/01 Editors: Arthur and Marilouise Kroker > _____________________________________________________________________ > > > The World Trade Center and the Rise of the Security State > ========================================================= > > > ~Dion Dennis~ > > > Reflecting on the images of a black and gray ashen Manhattan, the > skeletal remains of imploded skyscrapers, the survival narratives of > witnesses, and the images of the dead and dying, the iconicity of the > attack is striking: the date, 911, a shorthand for telephoning > emergency services; the airlines, "United" and "American," synecdoche > for the state, and the nation, respectively; the American Airlines > plane ripping into one side of the Pentagon, lurching toward its > center, breaking what had been a domestically unbroken pentagram of > power. As representative instruments of spatial deterritorialization > and globalization, Boeing 757s and 767s slammed into two prominent > icons of information and commodification, the Twin Towers of the > World Trade Center. As the buildings tumbled into a mix of black > smoke and debris that rushed down the streets of West Manhattan, the > utopian belief in Market Society also crumbled. As John Lennon sang a > generation ago about another rupture, "the Dream is Over." > > The abrupt and violent detumescence of the Twin Towers signals, > irreparably, the de facto end of an uncritical faith in Market > Society. While markets will always be with us, the universalist > prescription of "the market" as a form of social and cultural Viagra, > died on the streets of Manhattan, and in the images of destruction > dispersed to the rest of the planet.Embedded in the black smoke and > in the shredded and spongy mountains of glass, steel and cadavers was > the virus of endemic fear and perpetual anxiety, and the incipient > prescription and inscription of a nascent security state. > > What a virus does, biological, technological or social, is to > rewrite a basic instructional set on a cellular, machine-language or > cultural level, and then to spread that instruction set, upward from > below. That's what makes it a form of micro-power, low-tech, > secretive, adaptive and extremely replicable. What has so quickly > spread in the last few days is this virus of terrorism, from the > outer spatial and cultural margins of late capitalism (Afghanistan) > rewriting not just the mood of the U.S., but also the fundamental > stance (national identity and values) of Americans, and the > institutional routines of the state. Taken as a whole, the net effect > is of the American Empire stumbling through a sharp discontinuity > into its third, post-WWII ideological period. Below is a brief > mapping of the relationship between the past, the incipient present, > and the probable near future. > > The first ideological dream, an uncritical belief in government, > emerged after WWII. Fiscal policies informed by Keynesian economics > had turned the tide against the Depression, and the U.S. emerged as > an economically and technologically dominant world power by 1945. > Nearly three decades of rising standards of living (for almost all > demographic groups), and remarkable technological achievements, lent > temporary credence to an uncritical faith in the powers of > government. > > Durable as that dream was, it was ruptured by multiple and > persistent shocks: Assassinations, a morally ambiguous and unviable > Vietnam War, urban riots, political corruption (Watergate), and > structural changes in national and global economies (changes that led > to the "stagflation," in the post-1973 period). Symbolized by the > U.S. government's impotence in securing the release of 52 hostages, > in the wake of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the "dream of government" > as a universalist panacea for social ills lost its viability. With > the election of Ronald Reagan, the post-1945 American Empire entered > into its second ideological dream - an uncritical belief in the > curative properties of "market society." > > Symbolized by Reagan, and his charmingly simple and nostalgic moral > tales about the wonders of "the individual" and a "Mr. Rogers" > version of "the invisible hand," the redistribution of wealth during > the 1980s (spurred by massive changes in tax laws in 1981), and the > years of economic growth between 1983-1990 led many to conclude that > the mix of governmental deregulation and the hyper-redistribution of > wealth was the medicine that the country needed. After all, didn't > the Fall of the Berlin Wall, and "The Velvet Revolution" of 1989 > herald the triumph of capitalism, and the defeat of centralized > statisms? > > In the early 90s, the U.S. faced a massive savings and loan crisis, > enormous general fiscal debt and an economic recession. The > uncritical dream of market society might have died in 1993, but for > Bill Clinton's election. In the eight years of the Clinton > presidency, Clinton commandeered just enough governmental resources > to buttress the practices and discourses of market society. Informed > by Gary C. Becker's formulation of "human capital," Clinton found his > complement in Al Gore, an avid total quality management advocate who > was in charge of "reinventing government." Concurrently, the religion > of Privatization was the buzz word of the Gingrich conservatives. > "Whatever you [government] can do, I [the private sector] can do > better," they chanted. And so some of the practices [and much of the > discourse] of the private sector came to dominate how the public > sector and its workers were viewed, and how work and monies were > redistributed. > > By the 2000 election, the U.S. economy had lost its momentum, and > the shortcomings of an uncritical faith in market society became more > evident. Examples include welfare reform that moved people from > destitution to perpetual poverty; privatized prisons and schools that > were dens of corruption and misery; and institutional scandals, such > as an enormous (268 billion dollar) tobacco settlement from firms > that had previously shifted the health risks and costs from cigarette > manufacturers to the public sector. All of these areas (and many > more) demonstrated the narrow limits of the market as universalist > prescription and dream. > > And then came 911. Nothing in Adam's Smith's invisible hand, or in > Yahoo's web directory, or in short-term cost/benefit analyses, or in > any dream of the market (equity, futures or derivatives) and its > neo-utilitarian and commodified world-view could account for, or > prevent Boeing 757s and 767s from crashing the twin towers of the > late World Trade Center. No faith in "human capital" or a > commodity-based social logic (to run government like a business, > taking the low bid for airport security services, for example)could > mediate such transgressive violence. of 911. Thousands die, billions > are lost, fear reigns, and market society, which requires a > socio-political backbone of stability and predictability, loses its > patina of magic. As the offices of Merrill Lynch, Smith-Barney and > the Solomon Brothers disintegrated into ash, smoke and cadavers, so > did the idea of "market society" as a panacea to our woes. No market > tool (such as focus groups or surveys) can, by itself, counter those > forces that seek the destruction of the very idea of a Western-style > commodity market. Mark the date: On 09/11/01, that particular > incarnation of Market Society died. > > Market Society was the target, not the weapon. It failed to > guarantee order. Government did not foresee nor act - it failed to > guarantee order. Our third ideological dream may be organized around > a more intensive version of what Richard Ericson called a "policing > [of] the risk society." As terroristic violence becomes increasingly > dispersed, fluidic and possible almost anywhere, at any time, it does > so by evading pre-existent risk-management techniques (as was the > case on September 11th). The goal of state-centered responses will be > to hone deterrence and policing strategies via intensified modes of > militarization. Continuous surveillance, intensified > information-collection and analysis techniques, and the honing of > rapid deployment of counter-terrorism units may well be prominent, > very soon, in the daily routines of American life. The boundaries of > American life are in the process of a fundamental and rapid > reconfiguration. > > Especially if there are some initial successes, the American Empire > may be embracing this information-intensive dream of security as a > paramount value, at the beginning of the new century. Fear is its > engine. > > _____________________________________________________________________ > Dion Dennis is Visiting Assistant Professor, Dept of > Psychology/Sociology, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, System > Center Palo Alto (San Antonio) > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > * CTHEORY is an international journal of theory, technology > * and culture. Articles, interviews, and key book reviews > * in contemporary discourse are published weekly as well as > * theorisations of major "event-scenes" in the mediascape. > * > * Editors: Arthur and Marilouise Kroker > * > * Editorial Board: Jean Baudrillard (Paris), Bruce Sterling (Austin), > * R.U. Sirius (San Francisco), Siegfried Zielinski (Koeln), > * Stelarc (Melbourne), Richard Kadrey (San Francisco), > * DJ Spooky [Paul D. Miller] (NYC), Timothy Murray (Ithaca/Cornell), > * Lynn Hershman Leeson (San Francisco), Stephen Pfohl (Boston), > * Andrew Ross (NYC), David Cook (Toronto), Ralph Melcher (Santa Fe), > * William Leiss (Calgary), Shannon Bell (Toronto), > * Gad Horowitz (Toronto), Deena & Michael Weinstein (Chicago), > * Andrew Wernick (Peterborough). > * > * In Memory: Kathy Acker > * > * Editorial Correspondents: Ken Hollings (UK), > * Maurice Charland (Canada), Steve Gibson (Çanada/Sweden). > * > * Editorial & Technical Assistant: Adam Wygodny > * WWW Design & Technical Advisor: Spencer Saunders (CTHEORY.NET) > * WWW Editor: Carl Steadman (CTHEORY.COM) > > ____________________________________________________________________ > To view CTHEORY online please visit: > http://www.ctheory.net/ > > To view CTHEORY MULTIMEDIA online please visit: > http://ctheorymultimedia.cornell.edu/ > > To view CTHEORY.COM please visit: > http://www.ctheory.com > ____________________________________________________________________ > > * CTHEORY includes: > * > * 1. Electronic reviews of key books in contemporary theory. > * > * 2. Electronic articles on theory, technology and culture. > * > * 3. Event-scenes in politics, culture and the mediascape. > * > * 4. Interviews with significant theorists, artists, and writers. > * > * 5. Multimedia theme issues and projects. > * > * CTHEORY is sponsored by New World Perspectives. > * > * Special thanks to Concordia University for CTHEORY office space. > * > * No commercial use of CTHEORY articles without permission. > * > * Mailing address: CTHEORY, Concordia University, 1455 > * de Maisonneuve, O., Montreal, Canada, H3G 1M8. > * > * Full text and microform versions are available from UMI, > * Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Canadian Periodical Index/Gale > * Canada, Toronto. > * > * Indexed in: International Political Science Abstracts/ > * Documentation politique international; Sociological > * Abstract Inc.; Advance Bibliography of Contents: Political > * Science and Government; Canadian Periodical Index; > * Film and Literature Index. > _____________________________________________________________________ http://www.meome.de/independentfilm mailto:tallmer@gmx.de ------------------------------------------------------- rohrpost - deutschsprachige Liste fuer Medien- und Netzkultur Archiv: http://www.nettime.org/rohrpost Info: http://www.mikro.org/rohrpost Ent/Subskribieren: http://post.openoffice.de