Andreas Broeckmann on Fri, 11 Feb 2000 10:59:06 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: <nettime> turning Austria inside o |
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:22:41 +0000 From: Eva Grubinger <EvaGrubinger@compuserve.com> Most people who reacted to curator/critic Robert Fleck's email-initiative disagreed with the suggested boycott of Austria's artworld and instead asked for support of any cultural opposition to the new rightwing government. But what can actually be done? An attempt to formulate some basics and conclusions. Haider's Austria should not be seen as an isolated national problem - it is rather the monstrous symptom of a general turn to the right for the last 15-20 years throughout Europe.Thus,the EU-members' decision to put sanctions on Austria can be welcomed, but we should at the same time take them by their word. From Fischer to Solanas - the authorities can be reminded from now on of their own moral standards put up against the Austrian rightwing government. Lets all, especially people in the media, follow these anti-Haider statements and collect them, like the nazi-statements by Haider or Prinzhorn have been. We believe that the move to the right in Austria and elsewhere in Europe was amplified, if not co-triggered by the Social-Liberal parties who adopted strict immigration laws and abondened any criticism of digitalized capitalism, i.e mimiced what the rightwingers had wanted anyway, as a way to gain or stay in power - while they left behind their clientele of lower middle class/lower class. At the same time, leftwing cultural politics, strangling itself in micropolitical distinction wars, vanished from the broader public field. Leftist people in the artworld/cultural world in- and outside Austria are now seeing more clearly than ever the need to overcome their partly selfimposed marginalization in order to form strategic alliances and use their "cultural capital" again on a broad sociopolitical level. Austria is a comparatively small country. People working in art institutions etc., the state curators for example, have been in direct contact with SPOe-politicians on an administrative basis. There is a realistic, pragmatic chance to try to trigger a discussion in Austria`s SPOe and/or Green Party that they have to redefine and reform themselves with a strong move to the left, to offer a true alternative, not least for the socalled "protest"-voters. Elfriede Jelinek has declared a ban over her plays being performed in Austria, Valie Export has rejected the Kokoschka-Prize, Robert Fleck cancelled his future commitments in Austria etc. etc. There is a good deal of symbolic power in these gestures, and we understand the motivation. However, we think there are options beyond a deadlock choice between self-fullfilling exilation and opportunism. As the withdrawal of the funding of the prestigious literary Ingeborg-Bachmann-Prize by Haider's Corinthia/Kaernten-administration shows - in reaction to the Bachmann-estate having withdrawn the right to use her name because of the new government - the neo-fascists are all too happy to get rid of any reminiscences of critical voices. Concerning prizes, grants etc.: People with high income should accept prizes (as long as they get them without licking boots), but redirect the money to initiatives put up against the current regime, e.g.: Get To Attack (http://www.t0.or.at/gettoattack) or SOS-Mitmensch (sos-mitmensch@t0.or.at). For many younger artists in Austria, state grants are an existential part of making a living as an artist, since there is no relevant national art market. To fight for that is a social, leftwing issue - otherwise, we would buy into the rightwing rethorics of artists being "social parasites" who didn't really need financial support anyway. Concerning curatorial jobs, exhibitions etc.: rather than cancelling and withdrawing and thus pave the way for the bootlickers, use all available resources to support a climate of free-thinking opposition - both with art and other means. The cultural adminstration in Austria had been taken care of by SPOe-members, who now had to make way for people like the right wing OeVP Burgtheater-actor Franz Morak, who as state secretary in the chancellor's office now is responsible for art including the distribution of money. We should collect and distribute information about these new people in charge (e.g.: via http://bbs.thing.net and/or http://widerstand.netbase.org), while those of us who know their predecessors from SPOe should try to involve them in a fight against the new politics. What can we do outside Austria? Help to keep or get the issue in the media and public (design poster campaigns, contact journalists, advertising people you know etc.); check out the Austrian Cultural Institutes in London, New York and cultural attachÃ?s elsewhere to find out wether the predominantly OeVP-people working there are supporting the new government or not. Exchange information about the people in these positions so we know our enemy or possible 'renegates'. Rather than frightening away from working with Austrian artists and intellectuals who are engaged in the Anti-Haider-fight, networking should be expanded. Eva Grubinger, Joerg Heiser (joerg@frieze.co.uk) grubi et orbi # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net ------Syndicate mailinglist-------------------- Syndicate network for media culture and media art information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate to unsubscribe, write to <syndicate-request@aec.at> in the body of the msg: unsubscribe your@email.adress