Andreas Broeckmann on Mon, 14 Dec 1998 16:24:32 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: VOTI ACTION |
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 09:03:10 -0500 From: voti-agent <agent@blast.org> Subject: VOTI ACTION TEXT OF LETTER SENT TO DR. MAXWELL L. ANDERSON, DIRECTOR OF THE WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART, NEW YORK, DECEMBER 1998 Dear Dr. Anderson: We wish to express our opposition to your treatment of curators Thelma Golden and Elisabeth Sussman. The recent restructuring of the curatorial departments at the Whitney Museum of American Art is indicative of a managerial approach that has been slowly developing in a number of major art museums. Beyond our wish to show support for fellow curators Golden and Sussman, we see your recent actions as signals of a pervasive disrespect for curatorial practice, and as signs of aversion to some of the most aesthetically and intellectually challenging experiments in contemporary art. Curators at many institutions today are caught in a kind of double bind. Art museums pride themselves on their proximity to an academic environment, positing scholarship as one of their highest goals. Yet due to shifts in the infrastructure of funding, museums have also adopted corporate management models - with the corollary effect that curators are treated as expendable workers. Contrary to both of these models, curators do not have the job security and intellectual support enjoyed by professors in the university system, nor do they enjoy salaries comparable to corporate employees. As a result, they are forced to stand on increasingly shaky ground, while serving as the primary source of ideas for their institutions' exhibition programming. The door is then open to all kinds of abuses. We find your actions in regard to these particular individuals to be a form of intellectual gentrification, if not censorship. The fact that Thelma Golden and Elisabeth Sussman presided over the controversial 1993 Biennial Exhibition, one of the most stimulating and contentious contemporary art exhibitions presented after the gutting of the National Endowment for the Arts, or that Golden then went on to curate "Black Male: Representations of Masculinity in Contemporary American Art," are coincidences that hardly escape us. Since when did exhibitions that set attendance records and raise genuine intellectual questions become a failure? Of course no one is required to subscribe to the aesthetic options of these two curators, but to admit that they are part of an important debate, itself linked to a vibrant focus of artistic experimentation, is surely necessary for a public institution that seeks to represent artistic practice today. To sidestep this debate over politics and identity in a multicultural, globally integrating society is to set a timid, unproductive, yet perhaps more easily manageable agenda for the Whitney. This troubling direction reflects a broader conservative trend, the mistaken return to an outdated conception of cultural history. We feel it is imperative to mark our opposition to your actions, lest they be misperceived as the innocuous restructuring of an organization like any other in the private sphere. Curating is an eminently public activity and must remain so, if the visual arts are to continue to generate the curiosity, the enthusiasm and the commitment that sustain our efforts as professionals in this field. Sincerely yours, Mónica Amor Zdenka Badovinac Bart de Baere Wayne Baerwaldt Carlos Basualdo Daniel Birnbaum Francesco Bonami Dan Cameron Christophe Cherix Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev Lisa Corrin Jordan Crandall Amada Cruz Okwui Enwezor Robert Fleck Douglas Fogle Jesús Fuenmayor Bettina Funcke Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt Hou Hanru Susan Hapgood Jens Hoffmann Brian Holmes Udo Kittelmann Aleksandra Kostic Maria Lind Rosa Martinez Laurence Miller Viktor Misiano Akiko Miyake Louise Neri Michelle Nicol Hans-Ulrich Obrist Kathrin Rhomberg Liisa Roberts José Ignacio Roca Yukiko Shikata Nancy Spector Barbara Vanderlinden Peter Weibel Octavio Zaya Friends and members of the Union of the Imaginary (VOTI) - a permanent forum for the discussion of issues pertaining to curatorial practice in the context of contemporary society http://www.blast.org/voti.html