GM - tedbyfield via nettime-l on Thu, 23 Jan 2025 19:32:45 +0100 (CET)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> nettime-l Digest, Vol 19, Issue 5
|
- To: nettime-l@lists.nettime.org
- Subject: Re: <nettime> nettime-l Digest, Vol 19, Issue 5
- From: GM - tedbyfield via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:32:22 -0500
- Authentication-results: nettime.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lists.nettime.org header.i=@lists.nettime.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=j9ypv/SP; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=evDoSoEp; dkim-atps=neutral
- Cc: GM - tedbyfield <tedbyfield@gmail.com>, Michael Benson <kinpix2001@gmail.com>
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 lists.servus.at 3E7051029F7E
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.nettime.org; s=default; t=1737657160; bh=pVqFe5dk80FgVxwXC/aWxUC4feGjzo2h5ksG3JfMRPA=; h=To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=j9ypv/SPvKRw9OM7Z4cyjEXfhefVzAv04kOpNdoj4AlitzUi4+DuF8YK7JB5uzr9H Rob2oqHrkUtxpKTo9YVMTwRcNaV0uU69EwyZECCIt/C7zGrz+vrImtp5kc+N+vBk/S YK1T+83a/8E7Uc7X3WIEE3Mttzu5Q3J53j5+3scA=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1737657144; x=1738261944; darn=lists.nettime.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=WaiBtsb/lKPYdr/ws+NbRCXWBlPqiQu+xjMwoAUGbUs=; b=evDoSoEp8HdWaIOl++HH/7g3vCVLOXwnOCFOIK7rY3c1RKoEDufyYSZGlM9pDj7RkH L05+3vlMUN9MUYsQ5v3KLO6weIepA/K8essxhTnoOjtTs56Jkg3Vw1puP18I1fACawJg Zct56+dDEUf5BiRJiY/oI0zWc0sfnMwb32JcDwXdghwksZGGotnv0bVPI3GhC0FD3A8N EeCeHG1gdMxh2Tv0GLJKaRlpv7fyzUnOqE+2PahKUNIUKCGreZKU47xAAz0nLiWNm7I8 y9fbCf6GzcgkPl+44hfgkDhMz+ejB3Ap7hVEpEg10I128MByMciq43WNyYSGmfv1HouJ Kxdg==
- In-reply-to: <CAF3eCHHuwu5aa3bV42Mr2DpczHAfOTLm6AyF5F=h0nigLhcujg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <mailman.1094.1737652955.1269.nettime-l@lists.nettime.org> <CAF3eCHHuwu5aa3bV42Mr2DpczHAfOTLm6AyF5F=h0nigLhcujg@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "<nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets" <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
On 23 Jan 2025, at 12:42, Michael Benson:
It's fascism. Sometimes a cigar really is a cigar.
🎯
We’ve had nearly a decade of experience with educated, seemingly
cultured people indulging in this kind of scholastic quibbling and what
I call Arendtsplaining: “it’s not *really* ‘fascism’ because it
doesn’t meet [X or Y criterion peculiar to 1930s Europe].”
I’ll never forget those golden moments when people — again,
educated, seemingly cultured people — argued that J6 wasn’t *really*
a “coup” because it failed, or because the armed forces weren’t
involved.
Note the centrality of negation in both arguments: they invoke some
notionally authoritative abstract model then fault reality for failing
to comply with it. In that respect, I see these kinds of digressions as
consistent with the *applied platonism* that’s consumed so much of
leftism — a by-product of its retreat into the academy, imo.
This function of this kind of pedantry seems to be ritual: under the
guise of conceptual precision, its mainly serves to (a) prop up the
speaker’s sense of superiority, and (b) shift the focus from *what is
to be done* to *how should it to be named or defined*?
Liberal denialism runs very deep indeed, and that’s how this
obscurantism is best understood.
Cheers,
Ted
--
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org